Catholic Kabbalism.

Alphonse Louis Constant, more popularly known as Eliphas Levi is arguably the most famous continental occultist in history. He is most famous for designing an image of Baphomet which is well known to all students and critics of the occult.

As one of the major figureheads of the occult revival of the 19th century, Levi somewhat unexpectedly began life training to be a priest at the Seminary of Saint Sulpice in Paris. In his youth Levi was an ardent socialist and was repeatedly imprisoned by the French authorities

The Church of Saint Sulpice is the second largest church in Paris after Notre Dame, and was known as ‘The New Temple of Solomon’. It is built in a resoundingly classical style, and where it not for the two towers it would be unrecognizable as a church and could be mistaken for a particularly ornate government building or municipal theatre. The style of the church has been described as in the ‘Jesuit’ style.

The church of Saint Sulpice is said to be the headquarters of the society of Angels and is the headquarters of the Congregation of Saint Sulpice: a Catholic secret society based on the Jesuits and according to the spurious fiction of Dan Brown’s book, this organization was a cover for the Priory of Sion.

This church gained a new notoriety as a result of the Dan Brown novel, the Da Vinci Code as being the secret headquarters of the Priory of Sion. It is said that Abbe Sauniere made a remarkable discovery in his strange little church. He was then sent to Paris and the Church of Saint Sulpice by his bishop where he met a man called Emile Hoffet who was an expert in ancient languages and his uncle was the director of the seminary, the same one attended by a young Eliphas Levi. It is said that Saunier studied some paintings at the church although which ones we cannot know.

The paintings on display at Saint Sulpice include a mural by Eugene Delacroix of Jacob (or Israel) wrestling the angel as told in the Bible. Delacroix is far more famous for his images supporting the French revolution, such a the bare-breasted mythical Mariane urging forth an army of sans-culottes to do battle in Liberty Leading the People (1830) with the bourgeoisie and the church. Or his image of heroic Napoleon atop a strident steed rearing up on its hind legs to inspire his men to battle. Interestingly Eugene Delacroix was also a Freemason and possibly a member of the Illuminati, as he was photographed with the pose of the ‘hidden hand’.

The French Revolution, according to the research of Nesta Webster was orchestrated with Jewish money out of London:

“One fact, then, looms out of the darkness that envelops the secret power behind the Orléanist conspiracy, one fact of supreme importance, and based moreover on purely Jewish evidence: the Duke was in touch with Falk when in London and Falk supported his scheme of usurpation. Thus behind the arch-conspirator of the revolution stood " the Chief of all the Jews." Is it here perhaps, in Falk's " chests of gold," that we might find the source of some of those loans raised in London by the Duc d'Orléans to finance the riots of the Revolution, so absurdly described as "l'or de Pitt" The direct connexion between the attack on the French monarchy and Jewish circles in London is further shown by the curious sequel to the Gordon Riots.”

The French Revolution probably had much in common with the staged and financed pussy-hatted idiots protesting Trump, since throughout history, some truths are eternal:

“Money and the hope of plunder are all-powerful with the people... Mirabeau cheerfully asserts that with 100 louis (d'or) one can make quite a good riot.”

Eugene Delacroix also painted the Massacre at Chios, painted some two years after the massacre itself by Ottoman forces landing on the Greek island of Chios and murdering some 20,000 civilians, men women and children. Interestingly a Greek survivor of the massacre, Georgios Stravelakis, was sold into slavery by the Ottomans and later converted to Islam to eventually become the Prime Minister of Tunis from 1837 to 1873 and undoubtedly was one of the personalities who paved the way for the acquisition of Tunisia by the French since the Ottoman state declared itself bankrupt in 1869 and was seized by the French in 1881 for the payment of Tunisian debts.

On the institute for Palestinian studies website, no doubt a front for the US Department of State and the CIA, I’m pretty sure ‘Institute of Studies’ whenever it appears is a euphemism for US intelligence, we can read Michelle Campos’ highly frank and somewhat over-excited article entitled Freemasonry in the Ottoman Empire.

And imagine my absolute lack of surprise when I learned that Michelle Campos was Jewish, since she seems to show nothing but delight for the Freemasonic Young Turks despite their key role in the genocide of at least 300,000 Christians. Imagine someone writing as gleefully about the growth of the Nazi party.

People like Michelle Campos are given doctorates and research fellowship grants as rewards for their ability to fabricate the historical record. Works by her and many other academic on a similar gravy train, become the voice of authority in matters of historical analysis and repeated and disseminated in the world at large by those students who studied at the prestigious educational establishments these liars call their lairs. Michelle Campos, apart from celebrating the Young Turks in an almost ejaculatory rhapsody of propaganda from the times of Madame Guillotine, is also a dab hand and covering up the causes of the Arab Israeli conflict and is keen to tell history that it was just a historical accident due to poor management during the Ottoman empire. Nothing to do with the Balfour declaration and the promise to Lord Rothschild that the British government would undertake to obtain Palestine somehow. It takes her a whole book to make this point and that seems to be the point that the more unlikely, improbably and fraudulent the thesis, the longer the academic must work in constructing their scaffold upon which to support their lie.

“Thus the Freemasonic lodges of the Ottoman Empire provided a fertile partnership for Young Ottomanist thinkers and reformers such as Namik Kemal.”

“Furthermore, while it is difficult to quantify the contribution of Freemasonry Lodges to the Young Turks before the revolution, a number of important Young Turks were active Masons, and hence the overlapping affinities of the two movements is clear.”

“Just two months after the Young Turk revolution, the annual assembly of the Grand Orient de France in Paris, included greetings and congratulations to ‘brother Masons’ within the CUP (committee for union and progress) and throughout the Ottoman Empire, articulating their support for the confluence of Freemasons and Young Turk ideals and goals.”

“Immediately following the revolution, Freemasonry flourished in the Ottoman Empire, particularly in the Arab and Balkan provinces.”

“Far from its origins as a closeted secret society pursued by the state and its secret police, during the Young Turk period, Freemasonry became legitimate and institutionalized as part of the new socio-political order.

Could it not be that the doctrine of fundamentalist Islam, as espoused and disseminated by Sufi/Freemasonic influenced groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, despite superficial appearances to the contrary, is still very much a tool of the Jewish elite? Could this be why groups like ISIS seem hardly interested in the cause of the Palestinians against Israel but instead seem intent on unseating Middle-Eastern government which oppose Israel.

Muslims are for the most part, very decent pious and kindly people, I should know because I’ve spent about ten years living and working in Muslim countries. They are however possibly one of history’s most tragic religious dupes in some respects. Having played their part in ridding the Christians from tens of thousands of miles of Christian lands from Libya to Jordan, from Turkey to Iraq, then providing a nesting place for the Edomite Jews for the next millennia in countries in which they would not have been tolerated under Christian rule, and that while living within their Muslim host countries, they plotted moves of their long game which would be to obtain Israel by force from the Arabs and spend the later-half of the twentieth century destabilizing Islamic Kingdoms and ancient dynasties in order to bring them more properly under their own control. The Jews achieved covert control over the Muslim world through the worldwide Marxist socialism movement which gained an absolute stranglehold over countries such as Syria, Egypt, Libya and Yemen while deposing their ancient monarchies. Morocco and Jordan were spared the loss of their monarchies in orchestrated coups engineered by Soviet trained Arabs, possibly because these two countries monarchs were from the Jewish Banu Hashem bloodline, and now the cultural vandalism wreaked on these Islamic republics is a gift of death and chaos that keeps on giving more and more position and power to Israel and world Jewry, the spider at the heart of all stratagems of death and destruction.

Although Islam destroyed Christian countries it resisted the Kabbalistic elements at that time. In such a way we have been served admirably on the one hand, but rather shortsightedly on the other. Islam is a force for good but in the persecution of Christians and the destruction and genocide of their people’s and cultures it has been used for great evil. Just like Christianity itself perhaps. A double-edged sword. Although it has served a purpose against Christianity right now, for the Illuminati, Islam is totally incompatible with their programme, although among the middle classes of countries like Morocco and Egypt through the Freemasonic Muslim Brotherhood in particular they have gained a remarkably strong foothold, but it isn’t enough. Without popular support they know they cannot proceed to the next level, besides Islam is an international movement and no Islamic country can be found or likely never will be found to totally diverge from the Islamic code. So there will be more bombs, terrorism and invasions for them, until they are totally dominated by either the Western powers or the destruction of their own infrastructures. For my part I side with the Muslims. I have spent many years in their countries and have felt at home here. Much more so than in the morally decayed west where the people do not see the butcher’s block their lack of moral of spiritual wisdom is leading them. Muslims will not be caught of guard quite so easily as we in the west have been.

Johan Valentin Andrae claimed to be the author of the near mythical text The Chemical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreuz, and featured in the documents found at the Bibliothèque Nationale de France, as the 17th Grand Master of the Priory of Sion. Also to feature heavily in the mythos of Rosicrucianism and the Priory of Sion were the characters of Abbe Louis Fouquet and Nicholas Fouquet who were the patrons of Nicholas Poussin. Nicholas Fouquet was the Superintendent of Finances to Louis XIV and a member of the Jesuit Society of the Blessed sacrament, like so many secret societies and Catholic orders, hides itself beneath the veneer of charity, but very little is known of this organization, such is the level of secrecy which has successfully been maintained for four hundred years, ‘protect the secret’.

Fouquet is tied in to the mystery of Rennes le Chateau by virtue of the following mysterious letter:

“He (Poussin) and I discussed certain things, which I shall be able to explain to fully quite easily – things which will give you, through Monsieur Poussin, (if you don’t disbelieve them) advantages which even Kings would have great trouble to extract from him, and according to him , perhaps no one in the world will ever hear in the centuries to come; and what’s more, this without much expense may even draw a profit, and these things being so hard to discover, that nothing now on Earth can have better fortune or be their equal” 17th April 1656.

“Beneath the alter of the church of Rennes-le-Chateau there is a chamber in which are tombs dating from the times of the ancient Kings, as well as documents which must not fall into unintended hands, I have had access to the crypts sealed.” Letter from Abbe Bigou, who was the incumbent prior to Sauniere.

Nicholas Fouquet was the King Louis 14th Superintendent of Finance which meant he directed the spending of the state in addition to negotiating with the great (likely Jewish) financers who lent money to the King. Cardinal Mazarin was the chief advisor to King Louis 14th. It seems that Louis XIV had some complaint against Nicholas Fouquet and upon the death of his mentor Mazrin in 1661 when Nicholas expected to take his place as head of the government, instead the 22 year old King had Fouquet arrested and underwent a length trial which seemed to break all the laws of the French legal code. It was clear that the King had some personal particular reason for wishing to depose one who had previously been so essential to the management of the French state. It is said that it was Fouquet’s dubious management of the French finances along with the expenditure of incredible sums towards his own personal aggrandizement, with chateaus and displays of the wealth which may have angered the King, but there are some strange details to this story which indicate that something else may have been involved. The Society of the Blessed Sacrament intervened to get the sentence the King demanded: Death, commuted to imprisonment but the King demanded that Fouquet be kept in strict solitary confinement and not permitted to speak to anybody and to receive no visitors and even the guards posted to him were forbidden to speak to him on pain of death. It is said that Fouquet served as the model for the Dumas’ novel The Man in the Iron Mask. The King then obtained Poussin’s mysterious Rennes le Chateau mystery painting The Shepherd of Arcadia, but kept the painting hidden and no one was allowed to view it without his express permission.

Could one surmise that Fouquet had come into possession of some dangerous secret and for this reason was hounded by the King whose stipulations that he be allowed to communicate with noone, might be in order to keep control of some secret so terrible that it could be a threat to the royal house and possibly even the church and state itself. Sounds like the start of a cheesy best-selling novel. Whatever the secret of Rennes Chateau it is unlikely to be something as prosaic and common place as a pot of gold. I would hazard possibly that the great secret he discovered hidden under the altar was an unknown gospel of Jesus Christ, one which to this day has remained hidden by the Church authorities.

So-called Cathar dualism is little more than the awareness that the Old Testament God was not the same as the New Testament God of Jesus’ ministry. In my opinion it is not necessary to call the Old Testament God ‘evil’ in any sense, since in all probability this God was merely a spirit being which had been adopted by the Israelites as their racial and religious protector, and he did just that, yet the Cathar heresy was clearly contrary to the Judaic influence which had informed the origins of the established church.

It is possible that the Cathars came to France some time in the 10th century after migrating from Armenia where they were known as the Paulicians, after a series of persecutions and genocides conducted against them from the 7th to the 9th century when Empress Theodora of the Eastern Empire had 100,000 thousand Paulicians put to death. In the Orthodox church Empress Theodora is venerated as a saint for allow the restoration of venerating icons after the period of Iconoclasm.

A great deal of nonsense is spoken about the Cathars. One mistake which many crystal gazing internet fools engage in is equating them with the ‘mystical adepts’ the Sufis and the Jewish Kabbalists. This is an appalling defamation and is the kind of ignorant noise which only those who know nothing whatsoever about the Sufis, Kabbalists or Cathars would engage in. There are some truly embarrassing web presences which use the name of the Cathars to vaunt their own new-age ego babble. One such writer has the Cathars meeting underground to commune with something he calls the ‘Almighty Creative Essence’, is that like a fragrant oil or something? I find this odd since the Cathars celebrated light why would they be creeping about underground looking for mystical essences? Such uninformed blabber makes one genuinely wonder what animates some people and it seems to betray an actual failure to understand what the Cathars were really about. There seems to be a widespread belief that the caves at Ornolac served as a ritualistic place of Cathar initiation but there is no evidence of any kind for such a claim apart from three half-baked websites incestuously sharing the same misleading information. It is possible that the Cathars hid in these caves while they were being persecuted but there is no reason or evidence to imagine that they conducted rituals of any kind here.

A lot of this nonsense comes from Rudolf Steiner and a deceased Glastonbury wizard Stanley Messenger, an aficionado of crop circles, King Arthur and Lucifer, and singularly failing to draw any correct conclusions about any of those subjects. One particularly noxiously silly website Anaiya Sophia decided that whatever fanciful nonsense they have made up about the Cathars should be the truth. Without doubt they probably ‘chanelled’ this information which is another way New-Age silly-billies justify the process known as ‘sheer invention’.

Some of this new-age creative extrapolation is based on Otto Rahn’s rather more scholarly, though hardly less erroneous 1930’s books to link the Cathar’s to the Holy Grail: Crusade Towards the Grail and Lucifer’s Court. Some have said that Otto Rahn was the inspiration for the character of Indiana Jones since he travelled widely around the world ostensibly engaged in a kind of historical treasure-hunt. It is probably no coincidence therefore that Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade unites Templars, Nazis and the Holy Grail, as a kind of distillation of the life-story of Rahn who was apparently a reluctant member of the SS after being courted by Heinrich Himmler who had taken an interest in his work. Rahn was eventually hunted by the Gestapo for resigning from the SS in 1939 and was found dead on the side of an Austrian mountain in a dubious suicide shortly afterwards.

Some of this extrapolation is more wishful thinking than good sense and puts the Cathars on the same level as the demonic Sufis and the creepy Kabbalists or even worse they try to put Catharism within the same context as the atheistic Pythagoreans, or even claim that the Cathars are related to ancient Egyptian companions of Horus and even Lucifer himself. Dr Leo Levitov, who in claiming to have deciphered the mysterious Voynich manuscript in his 1987 solution subtitled: A Liturgical Manual for the Endura Rite, the Cult of Isis, received notice from Terrence McKenna in his book The Archaic Revival and connected the Cathars to worship of Isis and Horus, where he outlines some of Levitov’s key conceits such as the mysterious illustrations of bathing ladies actually being examples of venesection, or Cathar ritual suicide, ‘Endura’ by bleeding to death in a warm bath, or of the drawings of unidentifiable botanical specimens being, without exception apparently drawn with symbols known to the Cathars and worship of Isis.

This is all highly unlikely, if anything the Voynich manuscript seems to resemble some kind of early work on detailing human anatomy, specifically possibly relating to the female reproduction system. The following website makes a good case for suggesting that the plants and fruits illustrated were specifically the fruit of the mandrake plant which may have been used as abortifacient or to ease child birth, since the Voynich manuscript features drawings of fruit which resemble mandrake fruit and the Latin words ‘ease’ and ‘relax’ have been identified in the text of the manuscript, as well as drawings of pregnant women:

http://ellievelinska.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-voynich-manuscript-anatomy.html

Otto Rahn continues, perhaps into the depths of error, when he tries to depict Montsegur as being the Grail Castle, despite the Grail castle being safely located nearly a thousand miles away somewhere in Wales. He claims that German grail romance writer of Parsifal Wolfram von Eisenback locates the Grail castle in the Pyrenees when he does no such thing. Parsifal is set in Britain because King Arthur war British and the accounts of his life and his court at Camelot originate with the Welsh historian Geoffrey of Monmouth who compiled much of the contemporary King Arthur material in his book History of the Kings of Britain. King Arthur was not a French Cathar although the story of the Knights of the Round Table and the Holy Grail were greatly romanticized by the French writer Chretien de Troyes who also included a passing mention to a ‘grail’ or golden platter on which food was served, although it was not holy at this stage in its literary career, and seems to be some kind of relatively commonplace piece of material golden treasure, without any of the religious or supernatural elements which would later be ascribed to it, and is one of an assortment of special objects, such as a sword, a bleeding lance and a candelabrum. It is for this reason that I personally feel that the Holy Grail is a red-herring and has not deeper significance or existence except for being a fictional device for later supernatural agency. It is possible that there were some kind of spiritual metaphors which were later represented by the Holy Grail, but the quest for any kind of literal object would be as fruitless as looking for gold at the end of the rainbow, even for either Indiana Jones or a former Nazi SS officer.

The Holy Vehm of the Catholic church, 15th Century Germany, a proto Soviet style secret police. This organization was a secret fraternal organization devoted to punishment and murder. It had its own initiation rites and secret oaths which must be kept under pain of death. The Vehm was so popular that at one point there were 100,000 judges of the Vehm in Germany, one assumes that the popularity was a result of feeling that it was better to be an instrument of the Vehm than a victim of it. Incredibly this secret terror and murder organization lasted from the 13th century to sometime in the 18th century, spanning an incredible period of 500 years from the Gothic age to the Baroque. Their symbol was a red cross on a white background.

These tribunals were known as Rose Cross, in 1371 they were reinforced by the wandering and outlawed Templars. They reemerged in the 1930’s working with the Nazis as their strong-arm men.

The following passage from Nesta H Webster’s classic of the genre: Secret Societies and Subversive Movements sheds some light on the historical importance of the Rose-Croix within the hierarchy of the secret society network:

“The most illuminating passage in the whole of M. Copin Albancelli's book is where he describes an experience that befell him after he had taken the degree of Rose-Croix. It was then that one of his superiors took him aside and addressed him in the following terms: "You realize the power which Freemasonry has at its disposal. We can say that we hold France. It is not because of our numbers, since there are only 25,000 Freemasons in this country [this was in 1889]. Nor is it because we are the brains, for you have been able to judge of the intellectual mediocrity of the greater number of these 25,000 Freemasons. We hold France because we are organized and the only people who are organized. But above all, we hold France because we have an aim, this aim is unknown; as it is unknown, no obstacle can be put in its way; and finally, as no obstacle is put up, the way is wide open before us. This is logical, is it not?" "Absolutely." "Good. But what would you say of an association which instead of consisting of 25,000 nonentities as in Freemasonry, were composed of, say, only a thousand individuals, but a thousand individuals recruited in the manner that I will tell you." And the Freemason went on to explain the way in which such individuals were selected, the months and years of observation, of supervision, to which they were subjected, so as to form a body of picked men inside Freemasonry capable of directing its operations. "You can imagine the power at the command of such an association?" "An association thus selected would do anything it chose. It could possess the world if it pleased." Thereupon the higher adept, after asking for a further promise of secrecy, declared: "Well, in exchange for this promise, Brother Copin, I am authorized to let you know that this association exists and that, further, I am authorized to introduce you into it."

The transliteration of Parsifal’s Grail castle known as Munsalvaesche, translated into French as Mont Salvat, to be identified by writers such as to the Cathar stronghold of Mont Segur is a fine example of what writer Richard Barber in his down to Earth and thoroughly reasonable book The Holy Grail: History of a Legend identifies as ‘dubious etymology’. He appears to be equally tired with the attempts to weave Catharism into a greater religious mystical framework, the work of Otto Rahn has been particularly unhelpful in this regard which, instead of analyzing the vacuum left about the Cathars by the church’s systematic destruction of all trace of information the Cathars, instead of perhaps more wisely attributing to them at least a more authentic Christian tradition to them than the Catholic church instead he tried to foist Hinduism upon the poor dead Cathars who are sadly not present to deny such imputations. It was Maurice Magre who for reasons best left to himself, decided that the Holy Grail was a Cathar legend, when it was in fact a Templar one. I can only surmise some kind of dark satire at work, connecting the myths of the Crusading armies which destroyed and burned the Cathars alive, to the Cathars themselves.

Many writers and historians have said that the Cathars were influenced by Manicheism. Manicheism believes that light is imprisoned in the world of matter and that upon the dissolution of the human body the light contained within its material prison can return to its source, if it has reached self-realization or enlightenment, or be reincarnated. It is ironic that Manicheism became the principal rival to Christianity since Manicheism had much more of Jesus’ message within it than the Christian church which seemed more obsessed with Earth dogma and endless internecine squabbles. While the Christian Church was firmly planted on the chessboard of planet Earth, on the one hand murdering its opponents in one turn and feeding the poor on the next turn, so attempting to balance its karmic debts and play the Tree of Life game, the Manicheists were firmly rooted to their white square and sought transcendence from the chessboard by merging into the light of the white square. Mani himself declared that he was ‘an apostle of Jesus Christ’, so in this sense Manicheism is a heretical form of Christianity. Perhaps it is no coincidence that the Cathars celebrated Manisola as a holiday and initiation event of the Cathar Perfecti.

The pagan emperor Diocletian, with the same fervor as his ‘Christian’ counterpart Pope Innocent III decreed against the Manicheist: “We order that their organizers and leaders be subject to the final penalties and condemned to the fire with their abominable scriptures.”

It is not certain what element of their scriptures Diocletian considered abominable, it is unlikely there was anything in their possession which could rival in degree of abomination, the actual act of ordering people to be burned alive because of their personal religious beliefs. And yet we find this same Roman mindset survived in all its simple-minded brutality long into the late middle ages in the form of the Roman Catholic Church. Perhaps there is a reason after all that the Catholic church styles itself as ‘Roman’ and celebrates the same feasts as the pagans of the old Roman Empire such as the feast of Mithras, the Saturnalia and Easter. Is the Roman Catholic Church nothing after-all but a continuation of the Roman Empire, with its paganism thoroughly intact beneath the mirage of a Christian edifice. The church after all has shown itself to be Christian only in name and not, not even in the smallest observable morsel, to be Christian in deed. In 354 Hilary of Poitiers noted that Manicheism was a significant force in Southern Gaul, precisely the area delineated as Languedoc and the region which would be later known as Cathar lands.

Theodosius I was the last emperor to directly reign over both the Eastern and Western halves of the Empire and was the first emperor to enforce the Nicene creed and made Nicene Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire, other Christians who did not adhere to the specific Catholic Nicene creed he termed ‘foolish madmen’. One wonders then about the mental landscape of such people, might one not be allowed to term something of their character ‘pathological’, for to be largely in agreement with other Christians but perhaps to disagree on maybe one or two small legalistic points one is consigned the appellation ‘madmen’ and hunted down and persecuted with inhuman ferocity. Theodosius then went on to elaborate on the confusing and wholly unnecessary creed of the trinity, which had become central to Nicene Christianity, despite it having its actual conceptual origins in the Jewish Zohar.

             The Creation of Church Tyranny

Nicene Christianity was established by the Edict of Milan in 313 AD which gave the Christian religion religious legal status within the Empire and is the basis of all nominally Christian churches presently operating in the world. It was here that Constantine I made the trinity an article of faith and cornerstone of the church yet it is based on one little line, a mere rhetorical device found in Matthew 28:19.

The Nicene creed established Jesus has having equal status with God and the existence of the trinity of the father, the son and the holy spirit, it also recognizes and codifies the supremacy of the Catholic church as being the ONLY church of Jesus and Christianity. “We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic church," from the Nicene creed was the beginning of the state's usurpation of Christ's ministry.

What is the origin of the trinity which is apparently so centrally important to the RC church? It is in the Jewish Zohar Tetragrammaton where we find the specific Catholic doctrine of the Trinity first expressed:

“Come and see the mystery of the word YHVH: there are three steps, each existing by itself, nevertheless they are One, and so united that one cannot be separated from the other. The Ancient Holy One is revealed with three heads, which are united into one, and that head is three exalted.”

Simeon bar Yochai was said to be the author of the Zohar and also expressed strong sentiments against non-Jews which many writers and cultural commentators argue, still informs Judaism today and is strongly expressed in the Talmud:

"Best of gentiles kill it, best of snakes cut its head, the most pious of women is prone to sorcery."

In Secret Societies and Subversive Movements Nesta Webster details how Jewish pseudo Messiah Jacob Frank sought to use the proof that the Trinity can be found in the Zohar as means to escape persecution from the church:

“The persecution to which he was subjected by the Rabbis led the Catholic clergy to champion his cause, whereupon Frank threw himself on the mercy of the Bishop of Kaminick, and publicly burnt the Talmud, declaring that he recognized only the Zohar, which, he alleged, admitted the doctrine of the Trinity. Thus the Zoharists claimed that they regarded the Messiah-Deliverer as one of the three divinities, but failed to state that by the Messiah they meant Shabbethai Zevi. The Bishop was apparently deceived by this manoeuvre, and in 1759 the Zoharites declared themselves converted to Christianity, and were baptized, including Frank himself, who took the name of Joseph.”

There is perhaps a certain irony that upon making Nicene Christianity the official religion of the Empire and ordering the banning of the ancient pagan rituals which had, it was believed, sustained the Empire for so long, that the Empire effectively began its eventually fall by breaking up into two halves, until finally the Western Empire withered and died.

Gnostic dualists are keen to point out the opposites in everything in creation, good and bad, up and down, black and white, and this mythos is central to the Freemasonic religion which borrows these ideas extensively from the ancient world and the Kabbalah. However the God of Jesus is more than just a white square on a Masonic chequerboard, the ministry of Jesus was all about transcending the chess board in the first place, there is no idea of duality in Jesus’ ministry, only of escape from the chessboard.

The Kabbalistic tree of life has two pillars, the left-hand path or ‘female’ pillar of Severity, and the right hand ‘masculine’ path of Mercy. The central pillar is the path of equilibrium, and it is apparently in balancing these two forces, in creating a synthesis of dualism, that the initiate rises to higher awareness. So this is why Freemasons feel they can sexually molest children with impunity, because at the same time, they raise money for children’s homes. They feel that in mediating their karma they are travelling happily up the tree of knowledge. Doing a bit of good here, a bit of evil there, but always on the up and up. Moving on the chessboard, from a black square to a white square and so on.

The Cathars believed God was an abode of light and one could say that in a spiritual sense, the Cathars had a knowledge of the quantum realm, since it is my belief that God is indeed found within the mysterious realm of transcendent light and they wisely rejected the Kabbalistic Trinity of the Catholic church. The Cathars were Christians not Gnostics. True Christians believe that the world is controlled by an evil force, which Jesus called Satan. Gnostics however wish to experience this fact for themselves. They wish to ‘know’ it for sure, hence Gnosis of ‘knowing’ not faith. For the Cathars I doubt there were any initiatory ordeals which could create this sense of perceiving evil in the world directly which would be tantamount to eating straight from the forbidden tree. The forbidden tree is the Kabbalah tree of life and making progress along it, balancing your Kama between severity and mercy, between evil and goodness, and experiencing the strange rituals and manifestations which the Kabbalah group will lay on for you, will eventually lead you to attaining Kether, the Gnosis and the full awareness of the human soul.

However the situation is quite as the Cathars believe, that the human soul is here trapped in materialism, and the Illumination of the Kabbalah leads not to any real liberation of the mind or spirit, but the sure knowledge of its imprisonment. This leads the vast majority of Kabbalists to reject God and indulge their senses to try to obtain what pleasure they can from their condition. Sex in particular is a major ‘sacrament’ of the Kabbalah, just as it is in Crowley’s OTO because sexual activity has the effect of briefly offering some mental relief from the depressing psychological effect of the Gnosis. I was in correspondence some time ago with a young man who claimed to be attending an Illuminati college who told me that the Illuminati use sex as a way to fend off schizophrenia since sex has the effect of reconnecting the mind with the physical body and away from the schizoid burden of being a partially detached spirit which is effectively what schizophrenia as a psycho-spiritual condition amounts to.

Arguably by rejecting the Catholic Kabbalah, the Kabbalistic powers of the church in turn rejected them since in 1145 Bernard of Clairvaux leader of Cistercian order who in 1128 attended the Council of Troyes and drew up the rules of the nascent Knights Templar visited the Cathars. Bernard of Clairvaux, in common with the dogma of the Catholic Church, held Mary in special esteem and she was known as The Queen of Heaven, a name which was also used by those who worshipped Isis, Astarte, Juno, Hera, or by any name by which the female pagan Goddess archetype was known as. It is tragically ironic that those who were so busy persecuting those true Christians who it is claimed were practicing heresy were perhaps only heretics to the pagan Isis and Kabbalah trinity worship of the Catholic church. The true heretics to Christianity was the church itself.

Dominic Guzman was the founder of the Dominican order which established the first formal Catholic Inquisition. He is reported to have said of the Cathars:

“Preaching and entreaty have failed us, you will now receive the stick.” On March 10th 1208 Pope Innocent III called for Crusade against the Cathars. Arnold Armaury was the originator of the phrase: “Kill them all and let God sort them out.” He reported that: “Nearly twenty thousand of the citizens were put to the sword, regardless of age and sex. The workings of divine vengeance have been wonderful”. From this we can gather that clearly greatly enjoyed killing women and children, as the word ‘wonderful’ seems to indicate, it is clear that the man was what we might term a psychopath and we often find in the instances of serial killers and murders that they attribute their murders in some strange way to some kind of divine mission, whether it is through the pulsion of voices in their heads or strange delusions which have a twisted logic of their own which despite appearing nonsense to a sane man, might be enough to capture the mind of a mad one. It is therefore probably that such a personality as Arnold Armaury was a mad man whose mind had been captured by the strange logic of the Catholic church into sharing a delusion powerful enough to revel in the deaths of blameless women and children.

Simon de Montfort took Carcassonne after the Cathars had been evicted and his son became known for setting up the first English parliament which stripped Henry II of his unlimited power and then became the defacto ruler of England. It is he that Leicester’s De Montfort university is named after. The cruelty of his father Simon de Montfort was exceptional. He reportedly cut of the ears and noses, and the top lips revealing the upper teeth, of his Cathar prisoners as well as gouging out their eyes. In a terrible parody of the Biblical expression ‘In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is King’ is allowed the leader to keep one eye, and thus released these disfigured and helpless prisoners back out into the world.

Again, one cannot help but think there is something more than mere humanity to this cruelty. Clearly there is nothing of Jesus or Christianity in such treatment, so what is it? Beyond malicious psychopathy we find a terrible cunning which uses extreme violence and acts contrary to the religion it claims to be advocating. Do we have something Satanic at last in the character of Simon de Montfort? And what questions might the supreme rise to power and success of his son raise from an ethical and philosophical point of view. The question one asks of these bloodthirsty tyrants of history is why does the world reward evil with such success. Is there something in the machinery of the world which bends itself to the will of the most brutal and murderously psychopathic. If so, why? Might this be what Jesus meant when he said ‘friendship with the world is enmity against God’. Does the world simply reward evil? What could be the mechanism for this system?

The Roman Church, to be blunt, is an instrument of Satan. It is an institution which developed from Roman morality and ethics, and those revolved around the use of force, torture and genocide to enact their foreign policy. The Roman Church governed its territories in exactly the same way as the Roman Empire governed its foreign territories. There is no difference. There is nothing of Jesus which has moderated the Roman temperament and Jesus exists only as a name which has been borrowed. It might just as well be Jupiter and Venus which the Roman Catholic Church reveres as Jesus and Mary since they are just names without any deeper meaning. The Roman Catholic Church represents the defeat of Christianity and the adoption of Theodosius of Christianity as the official Roman religion represents the greatest disaster to befall the followers of Jesus since the crucifixion and murder of the apostles. Those who are members of the Catholic church are brought away from God not closer to him. This can be done in many different ways. In the Catholic orphanages and children’s homes the old priests and bishops would sexually molest the children, ensuring that they were traumatized and estranged from god and inner peace. Sexual trauma to a child has many effects but the most pronounced one is the loss of security in the self. The loss of peace and comfort to be replaced by anxiety, tension and fear and this can develop in later life into schizophrenia. This leads to the same sense of estrangement from the self which the Kabbalah Gnosis furnishes its deluded followers the direction to, to quote the sentry from Macbeth, ‘the primrose way to the everlasting bonfire.’

The Canaanite Deception.

Adam Weishaupt who created the sex and blackmail cult called The Illuminati was a Jewish professor of Law in Germany. The modern banking system which was created by the Templars when they returned from the Jewish holy-land is still controlled by the Jewish Rothschild family. And now the whole world is being brought to the verge of total war because certain people want to kill Muslims by the thousand to apparently protect the security of Israel in a region which has suddenly, after over a thousand years of tranquility, become a centre of bloody carnage and a flash-point for world war 3 and the potential death of millions.

It's clearly not worth it. Why is the world on the verge of mass destruction for one tiny little state which doesn't even have the dignity of calling itself a nation?

Is it any surprise that people blame the Jews? When we're all teetering on the edge of death and destruction because of wars and insecurity which has been fomented on their behalf?

Fact is it's not Jews, and least not Real Jews (whoever they are), but they DO call themselves Jews, in fact they are Canaanites but that is a BIG subject which requires a little research and is a state of play which has remained for some two and a half thousand years. 

"Behold, I will cause those of the synagogue of Satan, who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie-- I will make them come and bow down at your feet, and make them know that I have loved you." Revelation 3:9

What is called Judaism these days was actually taken over by their mortal enemies the Edomites, a race of Canaanites, who had occupied ancient Israel in the absence of the Israelites and upon their return to Zion in 538 BC from the Babylonian captivity, they had no choice but to accommodate their ancient enemies. Then, the infiltration of the Canaanites progressed further still as a result of Hyracanus' unwise policy:

Hebron remained under Edomite control until Judas Maccabeus retook the city under Jewish control in 164 B.C. Thirty-eight years later, in 126 B.C., they had to be reconquered by the Jewish Army under prince and high priest John Hyrcanus. A pivotal event then took place in which Idumeans were forced to be proselytized into Judaism or flee or die. This resulted in many Idumeans pretending to become Jews, yet really were not.

The law of Moses would not allow the present state of Israel to exist since there is no covenant with God, and bombing women and children is certainly not Kosher. 

Also modern Jews, particularly those in Israel are not genetic Jews at all but are Khazars among other things. Edomites are those who secretly control the Roman Catholic church (since Rome and its cults also have their origins in Edom and the Canaanites) and fake Pharisee system which calls itself Judaism (but has nothing of Jacob, Moses or Abraham in it but is all perversion and hatred).

The Talmud is quite late in 'Jewish' history from the 5th century AD roughly and onwards. Early Judaism of course is the core of all our present moral values, but some five centuries before the birth of Christ it had become corrupted by the enemies of the true people of Israel. The Canaanite lineage of Esau which includes King Herod, the Pharisees and Rabbinical Judaism. 

The dominance of the Canaanites. The world's traders and later, the world's bankers.

Real Judaism and real Jews are God's people, like all people who revere and love God, but where are they? I can find none, or at least very few. How many of God's people are in Israel as they agitate to kill more Muslims and drag the US into world war 3?

The true Jews are now probably lost and the trouble in the middle-east in not between Arabs and Jews but Arabs and Edomites. The Edomites were a Canaanite people who infiltrated into Israel in the mid classical period and became what are called The Pharisees. They wrote the Talmud where it is permissible to have sex with children for instance. They are the sons of Cain the eternal enemy of true Jews. 

It is this modern Canaanite faction, who hide within Judaism, which creates all of the fake controversy in modern life and dictates the cultural and social agenda based on their own infighting and false dichotomies.

A good example would be Nick Denton, a 'Jewish' establishment finance journalist and owner of Gawker media. He studied the classic holy trinity course for aspiring establishment lackeys: PPE or Politics, Philosophy and Economics at Oxford, and was the editor of the student magazine Isis, this is especially relevant considering the feminist and goddess associations later in this article.

He seems to excel in creating tedious social-change controversies which then leak out into the real world, in the manner of the Hegelian dialectic or 'problem-reaction-solution' meme. The editor of his Valleywag magazine Owen Thomas was involved in a social change controversy when he apparently 'outed' and mocked certain influential silicon valley homosexuals, thus creating a false intrigue and media reaction that something should be done to end the open persecution of homosexuals. 

Denton himself is homosexual and married his partner Derrence Washington in May 2014. A tell-tale sign of the morality of the Canaanite mystery cult which exists invisibly and unsuspected, within our own civilisation and whose values and abnormal norms, are inculcated within society as a whole as the New Normal, within their media operations.

Denton also repeated a similar trick, creating a false controversy in writing a banal and stupid kiss and tell piece about a night he spent with Christine O'Donnell in which he states he did not have sex with here but merely slept naked in the same bed. For some reason this incited The National Organisation of Women and Salon magazine to play their part in the dialectic and further generate false controversy:

The National Organization for Women condemned the piece as "slut-shaming". NOW's president, Terry O'Neill, stated, "It operates as public sexual harassment. And like all sexual harassment, it targets not only O'Donnell, but all women contemplating stepping into the public sphere."[12] Salon's Justin Elliott criticized the ad hominem nature of the article, tweeting "Today, we are all Christine O'Donnell."[13]

He has also involved himself in the Gamer-Gate controversy and admitted to hiring internet provocateurs and trolls to attack Gamer-Gate activists and attempt to destroy the movement. http://theralphretort.com/gawker-owner-nick-denton-admits-gamergate-sabotage/

It is no doubt for this reason, of his aptitude to play the part of social change agent, create fake controversies, and massage the media agenda, that the man has amassed a personal fortune of £190 million.

Nick Denton's Gawker media is also the home of Jezebel, a Feminist website whose contributors are mostly Jewish women and a great many of their stories revolve around Israel and Jewish issues. It also claims that "Feminism enhances the Jewish tradition". It is one of several blogs owned by Nick Denton's Gawker media. Predictably, Jezebel was founded by a Jewish woman named Anna Holmes.

Jezebel was the daughter of the King Ethbaal of Tyre. The name Ethbaal means 'with Baal', the demonic God to whom child sacrifice was made at the Baalbek temple.  Jezebel, whose name also evoke Baal and the word 'Jezebel' was a ritual cry during the mysteries of Baal in the underworld and means 'Where is Baal?', enters history as being the wife of King Ahab of Northern Israel and being infamous for having the prophets of Israel brutally put to death, and replaced the prophets of Israel with the Prophets of Baal and Asherah. 

So after all the prophets, Isaiah calling down fire from heaven to show the dominance of the Hebrew God over the Canaanite Baal and the destruction of Baal’s temples, is the final result victory for Jezebel and her Canaanite priests like Nick Denton and other millionaire media lackeys with their ceaseless and sleepless social engineering agenda?

The Jezebel Team. The majority of ladies here are ethnically Jewish. Why is a social minority in the driving seat of dictating gender politics and gender relations?

One wonders why then should Jezebel be seen as fitting representative of Jewish feminism? She wasn't Jewish and did all she could to destroy the prophets and religion of Israel and replace it with that of her Canaanite Baal worship. Jezebel was one of the greatest enemies of the Jewish people and culture. Is it perhaps an indication that the forces behind so called 'Jewish Feminism' are not Jewish at all but actually Canaanites following their secret religion of Asherah goddess worship?

Jewish Feminist Ashley Feinberg writer for Jezebel recently wrote for the world's edification an article entitled: Would You Fuck a Goat for Your True Love?

The twist is that in order to be with this person—this person that you objectively know is the key to you being as happy and fulfilled as you possibly can—you have to have sex with a goat. And not just once, but once every three months. Four times a year, the only thing standing between you and eternal bliss in your (non-goat) relationship is a single, windowless room and one (1) farm animal waiting for your tender touch. 

Should you decline the offer, you will never see the love of your life again, forcing you to suffer the consequences of all that entails.

One wonders in what way is it empowering women for them to consider the possibility of having sex with a goat? Of course, within the context of normal human relationships and female empowerment it makes no sense and just sets up a cognitive block in any sane individual. 

Canaanite mystery religion. Women and goats.

But if we consider that this kind of thing, sex with animals, is precisely the kind of activities which the Canaanites engaged in. 

Canaanite mystery religion: Men and goats.

The Tale of the Beatle and the Goat.

Also secret societies such as Freemasons and the OTO are rumoured to have sex with animals, and Aleister Crowley forced his mistress to have sex with goats and apparently it was a problem for the early Hebrews so much so that Leviticus needed to have a word:

Leviticus 18:23:  You shall not have sexual relations with any animal and defile yourself with it, nor shall any woman give herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it: it is perversion.

Ashley Feinberg: Animal Lover.

Some people have the impression that the Freemasons are a Jewish organisation, or at least that somehow they are working for the interests of the Jewish people and the state of Israel. While the latter is true: that they ARE most assuredly working for the state of Israel, and they have been doing just that for nearly a thousand years when they were originally established as the Knights Templar, the former, that they are a Jewish organisation is most assuredly untrue. 

The Freemasons are not Kosher and the confusion arises because modern Judaism has assumed the symbols of Freemasonry such as the star of Remphan or Seal of Solomon.

Seal on Canaanite grave at the British Museum: Nizar Nayouf

Acts 7:43 "Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Remphan, figures which ye made to worship them: and I will carry you away beyond Babylon." Amos 5:26 "But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves."

All road leads to Canaan. The Papal Knights of Malta have their origins as Phoenician traders.

In fact most of what considers itself Jewish is not, but of Canaan. This is no better exemplified than in ‘Jewish’ feminist magazine called Lilith. I once dated a Turkish feminist and she told me that feminists revere Lilith and Cybele and all the demonic goddesses of the ancient world. That Lilith according to Judaism, is an actual DEMON ought to give a confessing Jew pause for thought and consider perhaps that celebrating demons isn’t what Abraham and Moses quite had in mind. 

Canaanite Ghouls can't smile.

Especially if we observe that two of their issues feature the following content:

Is it shameful to be Jewish and poor? A new marriage ritual for domestic equality. Seeing a child through transgender surgery.

Passover celebrations from unusual perspectives. A new ritual for an adopted daughter. Naming ourselves. Getting an abortion in Israel today.

Children having transgender surgery and abortions? Are these female values? surely they are the very opposite. But Lilith is known as a demon of child murder:

Lady Lilith is an oil painting by Dante Gabriel Rossetti first painted in 1866–68 using his mistress Fanny Cornforth as the model, then altered in 1872–73 to show the face of Alexa Wilding.[1] The subject is Lilith, who was, according to ancient Judaic myth, "the first wife of Adam" and is associated with the seduction of men and the murder of children. She is shown as a "powerful and evil temptress" and as "an iconic, Amazon-like female with long, flowing hair."[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Lilith

Not only anti-feminine but anti-human. Would a nurturing loving mother allow or even consider letting a child have transgender surgery? Of course not, it makes no sense to normal people. But by people touched by the ancient evil of the Canaanite bloodline, a sort of amoral and psychotic twilight zone or Duat, then rolling out this agenda to the world at large must fulfill some sort of hatred of normality and the natural healthy order of things.

These people, whether they even know it or not, are not Jews at all, but they represent the victory of the Phoenician faction of Esau’s Edomites which have wrestled with the followers of Moses for thousands of years.

The Esau Canaanite faction is highly active in the world and represents the world most effective, well connected and secure secret intelligence agency in the world, and according to Ostrovsky, most of its agents are just normal Jews:

The Mossad - believe it or not - has just 30 to 35 case officers, or katsas, operating in the world at any one time. The main reason for this extraordinary low total, as you will read in this book, is that unlike other countries, Israel can tap the significant and loyal cadre of the worldwide Jewish community outside Israel. This is done through a unique system of sayanim, volunteer Jewish helpers.

The real attitude of the historical Edomites towards the REAL Jews is reflected, as Chuck Missler observes:

As the Babylonians took Judah into captivity, and angry soldiers wrecked the walls, slew the people, and burned the city, we could have observed their neighboring citizens—the Edomites—encourage the Babylonians to ruin the city: “Raze it! Raze it!” they were calling. “Dash their little children against the stones and wipe out the Jews!”

In 47 B.C. Julius Caesar promoted the Idumean Antipater as procurator over Judea, Samaria and Galilee. In 37 B.C., the Romans named Herod, son of Antipater, as King over Israel. (His mother was Nabatean). Thus, the Herods of the New Testament were Edomites: One of them killed the Jewish babies in his attempt to destroy Christ; another Herod murdered John the Baptist; another one killed James the brother of John.

http://www.khouse.org/articles/2010/920/print

Even Jesus, who perhaps more than any other human seemed to have the greatest understanding of the real divine principle and perhaps, even assimilated it as he claims, ‘the father and I are one’ and for attempting to divest the parasitical structure of the ritualistically keen but spiritually dead Pharisees from the face of spirituality, he was murdered by those same authorities.  Jesus was a real Jew, a son of Man, murdered by the Pharisees, the false Jews and sons of the serpent seed.

The LORD God said to the serpent, "Because you have done this, Cursed are you more than all cattle, And more than every beast of the field; On your belly you will go, And dust you will eat All the days of your life; And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise you on the head, And you shall bruise him on the heel."Genesis 3:15.

When Jesus addresses the 'Jewish' authorities of Jerusalem, the Pharisees we can observe that these same powers, this same bloodline, is plaguing humanity even know, with lies, immorality, perversion and death:

“If you were Abraham's children, you would be doing the works Abraham did, but now you seek to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God. This is not what Abraham did. ... You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies." John 8:39,40,44. 

The Hebrew prophet Isaiah had perhaps done more than any other to rebuke and vanquish the works of the Canaanites. 

"How you have fallen from heaven, morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations! You said in your heart, 'I will ascend to the heavens; I will raise my throne above the stars of God; I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly, on the utmost heights of Mount Zaphon. I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.' But you are brought down to the realm of the dead, to the depths of the pit. Those who see you stare at you, they ponder your fate: 'Is this the man who shook the earth and made kingdoms tremble, the man who made the world a wilderness, who overthrew its cities and would not let his captives go home?' Isaiah14:12

This is Isaiah taunting a dead king of Babylon, by calling the dead king ‘Helel ben Shaḥar” Shining one of the morning, Isaiah is evoking the Goddess of the Canaanites Atta, otherwise known as Astarte, and thus Lucifer/Venus. 

The Temple of Venus is in the Beqaa Valley of Lebanon in the town of Baalbek. Star of David or Canaanite seal of Lilith/Venus/Asherah?

Baalbek. Canaanite Goddess with Canaanite star of Remphan.

However that would mean that Lucifer was a woman, or at least that Lucifer evokes worship of the so-called ‘sacred feminine’, and Astarte is sacred to feminists as the Mother Goddess. Therefore Feminism is in reality a Canaanite cult where abortion is a sacrament, and like all aspects of Canaanite Satanic mystery religion, leads only to discord conflict and the destruction of harmonious human society. 

The Canaanites are out there and they are busier than they have ever been.

What will be the Canaanites' next move? Economic collapse? More theft of public money for banker bail-ins? Or will they go all out and unleash death from the skies using nuclear weapons? 

And who can stop them now their evil power seems absolute? The world has A LOT to learn about the truth behind the present world situation. Everything we think we know about Israel and Judaism is wrong. And this record is in urgent need of setting straight before Cain’s children totally destroy the Earth.


http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/bb980909.htm

http://www.philosophyforlife.org/crowleys-children/

The Neoplatonic Anti-Truth Suicide Squad.

Ismaelism was heavily influenced by Neoplatonism. Neoplatonism developed from Plato’s Athenian academy and was founded as a philosophy by Plotinus. Neoplatonism developed as a counter to Christianity and the ministry of Jesus. In the character of Porphyr of Tyre we find again the same ancient evil, the Cain to his Abel counterpart. Reminding me of something YouTube video maker Samuel William said was told to him by an MI5 operative: “for every truth there is a lie” the lie in this instance being Neoplatonism to the truth of Jesus’ ministry.

Porphyry of Tyre was a Neolplatonist philosopher of the 3rd century, student of Plotinus and vocal opponent of Christianity, he said “"The gods have proclaimed Christ to have been most pious, but the Christians are a confused and vicious sect." This is very much a somewhat underhanded compliment to Jesus since Jesus ministered for one God, the father, while Porphyr directly contradicts Jesus by evoking his pagan plurality of deities, and to call Christ ‘most pious’ so understates the case as to appear satirical. His work ‘Introduction to Categories’ was translated into Arabic and became a standard text of the Muslim world on matters of theology philosophy and jurisprudence and one wonders to what extent it may have influenced the Ismaelis and by extension the Knights Templar and Freemasonry. Without Neoplatonism and its subtraction of morality from culture and clear identities of right and wrong, good and evil one wonders if we would have a better more sustainable world right now, one in which morality and an objective thing called ‘good’ existed in all our daily transactions and those of business, finance and politics. Does it not seem sometimes that we as a race are just doomed to repeatedly fall into the same errors every-time they are presented to us? As if the Garden of Eden fall was being continually enacted, perhaps this is the price for the first fall and since then evil will continually express itself on Earth and seek to totally destroy the good altogether.

Porphyr was said to be mentally ill and at one point while in Rome, attempted to commit suicide, in fact he made several arguments in favour of suicide and it is believed that he became disillusioned with life and suicidal after studying his teacher’s philosophy. Do the words of Jesus make one suicidal or do they have the contrary effect? Could this not in itself be the true test of a system of ethics and spirituality? That which uplifts comes from the truth while that which leaves one confused and despondent must be based in deception and lies. 

Does life itself not respond instinctively to that which is nourishing and useful, while withering and dying should it find itself in a stagnant lifeless environment. For me at least, the proof of the stagnancy of Neoplatonic quasi atheism is the proof that it provides only depression and suicide in its very voice of origin. Is it any wonder such TV wise-asses like Stephen Fry and all the other conceited idiots of the entertainment world all come out seeking sympathy and a new fashion trend by normalizing pathological materialism and the resultant obvious depression at not understanding anything important about the universe and existence they are born into.

But to return to the ancient Middle-East and put those modern Canaanites on hold for a moment. Tyre was the home to the Canaanite Phoenicians, those who worshipped Baal and sacrificed children to Moloch, Porphyr also being the root of the word Phoenician and connected to the royal purple and giving its name to Porphyria, a rare genetic blood disease where iron cannot be correctly metabolized, which seems to have affected a large number of European royals and gave rise to the myth of vampires, since blood drinking and bathing in blood, would apparently alleviate the symptoms. It is no coincidence that the Freemasons revere the Old Testament figures such as Tubal Cain who was the offspring of Cain and Hiram the King of Tyre and the master craftsman Hiram Abiff since these two were Canaanites. Freemasonry is the Canaanite mystery religion and it is this which secretly rules the world.

Neoplatonism is the philosophy of the outer-portico of Freemasonry and Manly P Hall wrote extensively on Neoplatonism because it wrests control back from a moral absolute and returns thought spirituality and philosophy back to pagan uncertainty and moral relativity within which domain of course, Freemasons will have much more power to act, make money, sow corruption and engage in all of their myriad evils while being protected by what appears to be a rational philosophical framework. Yet when asked to define Neoplatonism the task becomes much more difficult. The trick of Neoplatonism is that it defines itself by what it isn’t. Neoplatonism isn’t Christianity, and that pretty much is its sole purpose, to not be Christianity and to offer as I said, a rational sounding alternative to people who would rather make their own rules to suit their inclinations and proclivities, whatever they may be.

I am keen to point out here that such a thing as good exists, just as its contrary and all which takes up arms against this good must necessarily be bad. Neoplatonists see evil as merely the absence of good and since everything emanates from the same source, all is one, Gods, demons, angels, all emanate from the same primary cause. This has the effect of depersonalizing the universe and creation itself, lending itself to ideas of blind mechanical forces within which spiritual ideas can still be accommodated, but they too are merely a catalogue of different kind of blind forces and agents. The difference between Christianity, Manicheism even Buddhism is fairly radical in this regard, since all three of those ideologies identify the realm of the material world as a temporary abode of suffering which must be transcended in order to unite with a benign and absolute spiritual force.

Neoplatonists tend to act from materialistic principles and judge all phenomenon, even the ministry of Jesus Christ as a materialistic phenomenon. It isn’t that such people lack faith, it’s more that they do not have the humility to accept that there can be a reality which exists beyond their understanding and they make no effort to even approach such a reality even half way and try to investigate. This is something personally which I find very hard to understand. What is peculiar is that such people are extremely common in science and are deemed to be highly intelligent but their intelligence seems to lay in pointing out what they know, while what they don’t know is relegated to non-existence. 

This seems to be the curse of the modern scientific establishment which is very good at pointing out what it knows, then making very baseless and surprising stupid proclamations about what it doesn’t know. As if the confines of the universe and reality itself is a box whose dimensions precisely measure exactly what modern science presently knows. Anyone with real intelligence knows this isn’t the case and that most of what encompasses actual reality and even the motor for life and consciousness itself, you know, the really important stuff, is wholly unknown to modern science, who don’t seem to lose too much sleep over it because no one seems willing or able to take them to task on it, since anyone who seeks to question a scientist will only be accepted as an equal in debates (and not mercilessly patronized or insulted) if they use the same measurement tools and scientific jargon as they. You can only fight science with more science.

For hundreds of years, scientists had been in direct conflict with the church in the battle for who can dictate reality. As a result of the growth in the power of what the French revolution called ‘The Third Estate’ that is, middle class professionals not affiliated with the church of the gentry (the gentry and church long being held together in a mutual bond of self-interest which goes back to the formation of European identity and social-spiritual cohesion after the fall of Rome) people worked together in a context which was outside the traditional power bases of the church and state. 

It can be argued that a great deal of scientific progress specifically emerged from what were hitherto considered occult and even the diabolic sciences, and this strange uneasy relationship between the occult and scientific progress still occasionally can be glimpsed in the work of people like John Logie Baird whom initially had hoped to be able to create an apparatus for contacting spirits but ended up inventing the television set, or with the work of rocket scientist and member of Crowley’s OTO, Jack Parsons, masturbating with L Ron Hubbard to usher in a new age of occult ET spunk powered demon piloted spaceships. It might seem crude to put the Crowley occult generation in those terms but if you do the research it’s a tragically accurate assessment and is a sad indictment at where our elite and secret societies are with their preoccupations.

The church had been a monolithic institution wholly dominating Europe for over one thousand years. It had developed a monopoly exercised under pain of terrible pain of physical punishments or excommunication, a single view of reality, not only of spiritual matters but of all matters. Science had ceased to exist since it did not fall within the dominion of church. In the same way now that under the sway of the modern scientific establishment the spiritual element to reality has ceased to exist, at least within the scientific perspective of reality. 

This is the greater reality which is projected out to the modern world as a whole by the machinery of the state including education and general culture and entertainment, and though citizens are given the right to practice their respective religions in most countries in the world, one observes that these rights are being steadily eroded as the rights of Muslims in France or Christians in America. Where in the first instance the rights of the secular republic trump those of Muslims wishing to wear their traditional clothing, or in the case of the United States, the rights of the newly empowered minorities such as homosexuals, whose rights now trump those of Christians wishing to practice their moral values in business. There is the growing sense that religion is seen as an inconvenience in the growing world order and this world order seems to be driven by an outer portico of secular values which hide, of this I have no doubt, an inner occult portico of actual demonic contact and worship.

And the most powerful people in the world share a common bond with the least powerful and most disempowered and afflicted. They share the burden of being dominated by demonic spirit voices operating on them and it is a tradition which has been perpetuated by the secret elite of the world for thousands of years.

A striking instance of this secret elite or what some call ‘bloodline’ would be to examine the Jewish orthography for the name Quraysh. The Quraysh tribe is an ancient middle-east tribe as was the one which the Islamic prophet Mohammed belonged to. The English version of this name is Cyrus which was pronounced Kurush, and these names all mean ‘sun’.

And so we have Miley Cyrus, the deranged pop Jezebel bringing forth ancient Canaanite values of Satanic amorality and schizoid mental illness. Her grandfather and Country and Western star Billy Ray Cyrus’ father was Ron Cyrus, who among other things was a regional representative of the Federal Reserve Board along with Alan Greenspan. With such a lineage one might consider whether today’s celebrities and pop-singers really rise to prominence is a wholly natural phenomenon and one might question whether these pop stars and actors are just the next generation of an old political establishment? 

It has been reported on Henry Makow’s website that Billy Ray and his daughter Miley would engage in incestuous sex shows at Bohemian Grove but I can neither confirm nor deny this rumour except that it would hardly surprise me and would explain why Miley Cyrus is so obviously mentally unwell and as Vigilant Citizen explains, explains the nature of Miley’s pop persona as some kind of dark priestess attempting to subvert the innocence of her child audience in the same way her own innocence was shattered by her father, it’s really all she knows and she’s merely externalizing her own conflicts.

Another striking example for me at least, is Benedict Cumberbatch, apart from having inherited a ridiculous name, is the scion of a highly distinguished and decorated military family, and his great grandfather was no less than the appointed representative of Queen Victoria in Turkey. It seems to me that the world of celebrity entertainment is all very much a family business.

My thesis is all of this is to try to demonstrate that the modern world has always been under the control of an ancient Satanic cult which originated in the Middle East and who were known as the Canaanites but now they can be known as Illuminati, Freemasonry, Wicca, and Judaism. All of these groups are now controlled by this ancient family which have their origins in the Middle-East with the bloodline of Cain.

Particular groups have emerged from the woodwork to specifically attempt to head-off any connection with pagan and occult groups and their practice of paedophilia. Well-funded groups such as the Sub-Cultures and Alternatives Freedom Foundation or SAFF, which calls itself an ‘anti-defamation group for new agers, pagans, occultists and mystics’ and they seem to go at lengths to reinterpret any pagan crimes uncovered by the press as ‘Christian scams’ or some-such nonsense. Their web-presence is so small so as to barely exist but I wonder if such a group is just the tip of a hidden iceberg of mutual pagan support which exists in the world to hide, obfuscate and cover-up any crimes committed by pagans and occultists which might emerge in the media. Perhaps this is the reason so few stories actually do emerge into the media, and any rumours that do such as Jimmy Savile being a Satanist are swiftly reinterpreted as some kind of Christian persecution.

So why do they spend so much time and effort covering up for paedophile politicians. Nothing particularly new age or mystical or pagan about Leon Brittan, at least not to appearances which is perhaps the key to all of this. If only the broad swathe of humanity had the magical gift to see beyond appearances, the world would be a vastly better place and our children would certainly be safe from these oily and odious powerful predators in high places. The Subculture Alternatives Freedom Foundation it literally sounds like what a paedophile group would call themselves if they didn’t want outsiders to know they were paedophiles, they’re like paedophiles with a shiny new victim badge who have found someone else to point the finger at who is the real bad-guy, not them: Christians.

Although within Christianity the modern Illuminati were born and raised. Previously within the Catholic Church with the Templar and Hospitalier Knights.

The Sovereign Order of the Knights of Malta is similar to the Vatican and the City of London in that it is Sovereign and subject to no other laws than its own. This model has been replicated on a worldwide scale by the Freemasons who operate under their own laws and are sovereign only to themselves. In fact the recent nascence of the Freeman movement has its origins in the Freemasons as Freemasons declare themselves sovereign and their only legal obligation is to pay their lodge dues. Everything else can be arranged and fixed for them within the sovereign jurisdiction of their order. I met a Freemason while stranded by poor weather at Kiev awaiting a flight back to the UK. 

To my great surprise he spent a great deal of time telling me how he drives without insurance or even a driving license, nor does he choose to pay tax. On the occasions when he has been summoned to court he was able to demonstrate that the judge had no jurisdiction over him since he was a sovereign and does not give his consent to the court process. He argued for instance that the policeman had no insurance documents when he arrested him and won his case. One often hears of such people trying these Freeman tricks in court but I suspect they only work when accompanied with the correct Freemasonic signs and allusions.

The Sovereign Order of the Knights of Malta is in effect a nation which is based in Malta. As a nation state it has only three citizens but some 13,000 members. The currency used by the nation state of the order is not the Euro which is presently in use in Malta but the old Maltese Scudo. It can even issue its own passports. It has literally thousands of operatives, assistants and members all around the world and is ostensibly an organization dedicated to caring for the sick, refugees, lepers and orphaned children around the world, but if the lesson of Jimmy Savile has taught us anything, it ought to be that charity makes perfect cover and provides excellent access for all sorts of other far less benevolent activities.

The three ‘citizens’ of the Sovereign Order of Malta are, at the time of writing: The Grand Master Matthew Festing; The Grand Commander, Ludwig Hoffman von Rumersteing; The Grand Chancellor: Freiherr Albrecht von Boeselager. Present members of the Sovereign Military Hospitalier Order of the Knights of Saint John of Jerusalem, Rhodes and Malta, include Cliff Richards, who became a member in May 2011. Other notable members include The Queen, former terrorist Nelson Mandela, George Herbert Walker Bush, Silvio Berlusconi, Joe Biden, Noam Chomsky, Sammy Davis Junior, Lord Christopher Monkton, Ted Turner, Frank Sinatra, the only man brought to trial for involvement in the JFK assassination: Clay Shaw, David Rockefeller, gay British spy for Russia: Kim Philby, Augusto Pinochet, Tony Blair, Michael Bloomberg, Rupert Murdoch (also a Knight Commander of the Order of Saint Gregory with Jimmy Saville), and Sir Cyril Smith the infamous Liberal party paedophile who was invested as a brother of the Order of Saint John in 1976.

www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/caped-crusaders-what-really-goes-on-at-the-knights-of-maltas-secretive-headquarters-9217469.html

The fact that Adam Weishaupt was a Jesuit at all ought to give us some pause for consideration about the place of a Catholic Jesuit within protestant Germany. The Jesuits have long vowed to reconquer the protestant nations and bring them back under papal control. Protestantism triumphed in Europe within the context of greater freedom of thought and the development of the printing press which brought the Bible into the hands of the people who swiftly realized that the words of Jesus, and the Catholic church seemed to have very little in common.

At the time of Weishaupt, Catholics in Germany represented a minority of believers and the Jesuits an even smaller minority within this subset. The Jesuits were effectively like secret agents of the pope and their mission was to destabilize those countries which had become protestant, and this is made explicit in the Jesuit oath as revealed by former Jesuit Dr Alberto Rivera and prior to this it was revealed in the "Subterranean Rome" by Charles Didier in 1848.

“I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.”

So if Adam Weishaupt was following his Jesuit orders, then it was his task to destroy protestant Germany and all protestant Christian nations, in line with Jesuit instructions. In fact this doctrine is just what the Illuminati doctrine became. Often commentators appear confused that Adam Weishaupt was apparently a Jesuit and Jewish and this has been fuel to commentators such as Eric John Phelps and his valuable work Vatican Assassins. And he is right, but the conspiracy doesn’t begin and end with Jesuits and the Vatican. The Jesuits are just another tentacle of the same ancient beast from Canaan. The Jews, just like the Catholic church, the pagan movement and the military, are just a tentacle of what Bob Marley called ‘Babylon System’.

Secret Roman Infrastructure 

It’s curious that we can easily observe that the Romance countries, that is Spain Italy and France, remained Catholic, while the Germanic countries of Germany, Holland and Great Britain, underwent a protestant reformation. This is probably due to the lingering Roman infrastructure which the Roman Church merely superimposed itself upon. In England and the Germanic countries, there was an alternative culture to the Roman Latin culture, while in Romance Europe, such alternative legal and spiritual frameworks would have perished along with the culture of the Gauls or Celts. Germany’s culture was inherently Germanic rooted in German Norse law in both sense of the word, while in Britain the Roman occupation had been replaced by centuries of Anglo Saxon rule. The Romans had withdrawn from Britain late in the 4th century, while their power lingered in Gaul and Italy and in order to survive it remained in existence in the form of the Catholic Church which in the late classical period had become a vehicle for the Roman state. In order to survive beyond the classical period and into the early middle ages it would be necessary for the Roman state to make deals with the rising Germanic and Gothic tribes who had started occupying former Romano-Celtic lands. And this is just what the church did, the Pope crowned Charlemagne Emperor, so the inference of course is that the papacy is above the power of the Emperor since only the papacy can bestow that power.

As a result in France and Italy Protestantism made no significant because of the mutual co-dependence of the monarchy and the Catholic church. Now what it’s important to realise is that there’s nothing special or elite about being a part of the Illuminati, or course they call themselves Illuminati because they want to appear special. That they are especially enlightened, or wise. They are agents following an agenda and that agenda is destruction of the protestant world.

It is also critically important here to also point out just what Catholicism really is, and that it has nothing to do with Christianity.

Who really was Constantine?

Constantine in 312, seems to have been instrumental in the creation of what we understand as the Catholic church, namely that of a pagan institution practicing pagan rites while disguising itself as Christian. Christianity in the ancient world had become such a force that it was a case for the Roman authorities, of, if you can’t beat them, join them.

Constantine however found that half of the Christians in the Empire, would not subscribe to the official Roman Government version of the faith, he therefore found it necessary to create ecumenical councils to create a legalistic framework for official Christian doctrine and used the Roman military to eliminate Christian cults which strayed from the official government religion. This would set the way for the various inquisitions and Crusades and Constantine more than any other person, can be said to be responsible for the development of Christianity from a charitable organization dedicated to helping and feeding the poor and providing a spiritual message of salvation to all, to what the church later became, the oligarchical tyranny which practiced torture and slaughter to maintain political control over millions of people.

In fact we can see a clearer picture of the kind of man Constantine was by examining that of his great rival and one time colleague: Licinius. Constantine was the Emperor of the Western empire while Licinius was the Emperor of the Eastern Empire. Licinius was Constantine’s brother in law, having married Constantine’s sister. Despite appearing to be a Christian, and despite co-authoring the Edict of Milan which granted toleration to the Christians throughout the whole Roman empire, thus becoming essentially fathers of the church in effect, both these men regulated the affairs of the nascent Church, perhaps, in my view, making it the monolithic and tyrannically murderous institution it would become. Licinius may have worked to bring the toleration of Christians to the empire, and some say he even converted to Christianity, but the man himself was hardly a Christian and in 320 even began to revert to persecuting Christians by removing them from the military and civil service.

Just as there is some doubt about Constantine about Constantine’s sincerity to his Christian conversion, ‘in hoc signo vinces’ apparently seen in the sky by Constantine before the battle of Milvian bridge.

Lucius Caecilius Firmianus Lactantius was a contemporary of Licinius and spoke in testimony of him that he had become a true Christian at a time when Christianity throughout the empire was experiencing an astonishing exponential growth, an although precise figures detailing the growth of the Christian population in the Roman Empire are simply not available in any concrete sense, Stark’s book ‘The Rise of Christianity’ offers a good as guide as any in a facts-vacuum and his figures which show how the percentage of Christians throughout the empire seemed to grow by a factor of between 4-5 every during a period of 50 years. From a modest population of 1000 Christians in AD 40, the power of a simple geometric progression ensured that by 300 AD there were over 6 million Christians in the Empire and by 350 AD this figure had increased to nearly 34 million, which in AD 350 was over half of the whole population of the Roman empire.

But what was the true guiding spirit of Constantine’s religious policy? Lactantius was a Christian apologist and the progenitor of the Christian church policy of a ‘flat Earth’. It is said that because he considered himself ‘Christian’ he had to automatically reject any science and philosophy which was non-Christian, which meant that he rejected all of the previous scientific discovery of the Greeks going back even to ancient Egypt who considered the Earth to be a sphere. The only thing flat about this reality is the registered brainwaves from this brainless fake Christian idiot who perhaps helped create what is known as ‘the dark ages’ a period where scientific discovery enters a retrograde phase because somehow Church authorities considered it contrary to the word of Jesus. Jesus has nothing to say about science and certainly has no position of opposition to it. Even in the old-testament the Earth is referred to as ‘round’ so what retrograde retarded philosophy was Lactantius really promulgating? Was it some kind of primitive retrograde philosophy merely disguising itself as Christianity?

It is also said that Lactantius’ works betray a total lack of knowledge about scripture and Christian principles, it seems that his job was more in the line of public relations, trying to make Christianity appeal to and fit in with the preexisting belief systems of the pagan elements of the population. He authored a tract entitled ‘De Ira Dei’ Of the wrath of God in which he justifies and explains the idea of an angry punishing God. A God it must be noted, which is entirely absent from the Christian New Testament and the ministry of Jesus, so what religion was Lactantius really advocating?

In the book Judaism of the second Temple period, the author David Flusser believes that Lactantius’ sources for his version of ‘Christianity’ are not Christian at all but Judaic-Hellenistic and that Constantine’s tutor and guide in all matters pertaining to Christianity, had little to no actual knowledge of the words of Jesus himself. Isn’t this an apt foreshadowing of the Catholic church which historically has seemed more interested in mother goddess worship and prescribing strict moral tenets on issues like homosexuality and birth control, which neither Jesus, nor indeed anyone mentioned in the New Testament ever expressed an opinion about. Simply put, Jesus had no interest on homosexuality or birth control because it wasn’t relevant to his ministry, so why were such things so central to Catholicism for so long? Perhaps because the source for Catholic religion is not Christian but Jewish. The Jewish old testament of course goes into great detail about homosexuality and the various punishments appropriate, not to mention the crimes of masturbation and birth control, as in the Old Testament tale of Onan the Barbarian.

“Then Judah said to Onan, "Lie with your brother's wife and fulfill your duty to her as a brother-in-law to produce offspring for your brother." But Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so whenever he lay with his brother's wife, he spilled his semen on the ground to keep from producing offspring for his brother. What he did was wicked in the LORD's sight; so he put him to death also. (NIV, Genesis 38:8-10)”

Although it is argued that the actual passage itself does not specifically refer to birth-control as being the agentur to kindle God’s anger, more the willful deception on Onan’s part, and Catholic Church historian Thomas Bokenkotter agrees with this sentiment by his acknowledgement that the Catholic view was based only on an interpretation of this passage coupled also perhaps with certain views from the ancient world that the spermatozoa was a miniature human being or the ‘homunculus’ of the alchemists.

And do on the basis of a rather weird situation from Middle East social ménage we have the full force of Catholic prohibition of birth control and condoms in Africa and the full and frank liberty this gives to the merry old AIDS virus. This is precisely the kind of nonsensical legalism which Jesus tried to warn us about and it does seem strange that the same oppressive character of religious dictatorship which held sway in 1st Century Judea should by degrees continue to persecute Jesus and his followers despite bearing his name. This leads us to one of the great questions of the human condition, whether there is something innate in human beings that when they try to legislate spirituality and religious belief the result is always a borderline tyranny full of half-baked spurious oppressive nonsense. It might be the somewhat unknowable nature of the next life and its conditions which provide something of a blank slate for over-imaginative and over officious religious busy-bodies to exercise their own petty systems of control over vast swathes of people, or it might be something else. It is the ‘something else’ theory which is a far more interesting one yet much more elusive to track down. Is there something else at work behind the scenes which ensures that no matter who or what rules the country or the world, it is always ‘business as usual’.

Both Porphyr, the voice of Paganism and Christian opposition and his contemporary and associate Lactantius, were born in countries thousands of miles apart but which both shared one commonality: they were both countries settled by the Canaanite Phoenicians in ancient times. As we explored in my previous book ‘Cain’s Children’ we can detect the presence of this ancient Middle-Eastern bloodline operating throughout history and always engaging in Satanic worship and bloodthirsty mass human sacrifices under various pretexts. We can also detect in this bloodline some tell-tale physiological and psychological ailments which apparently characterize members of this bloodline and have often been prized by some groups throughout history as allowing these people to better communicate with unseen masters, spirits and demonic beings from whom some are said to receive orders and instructions in return for success in their endeavors. Such tales however receive little credence in today’s artificially constructed secular atheistic age, I say ‘artificial’ because it is clear to me that this is a construction of the media, the scientific establishment and the educational establishment, and it is a miss-direction to hide the fact that the world is actually ruled by secret societies of occultists who know indeed that spiritual powers and spiritual beings are very much a tangible reality, yet it is convenient to them to construct an outer-portico in the world of broad scientific secular atheism to better dissimulate the true nature of the secret control mechanism operating on planet Earth.

Additionally two of the principal Church Fathers, founders of the so called Christian church, Tertullian and Cyprian were both from Carthage, the great city of the Phoenicians. Tertullian was a great proponent of the Trinity, a concept taken straight from the Zohar. Cyprian, like Augustine of Hippo received a pagan education and later apparently converted to Christianity. Augustine introduced the concepts of Original Sin and Just War. Augustine too was born in Phoenician North Africa. Aren’t we starting to notice a preponderance of North African influence in the creation of the early church? Also the theme of educated and enthusiastic pagans ‘converting’ to Christianity and apparently bringing all of their pagan baggage with them when formulating the new religion they called Christianity but which had very little to do with the words or acts of Jesus. 

The majority of the Church Fathers in fact came from distinguished and wealthy families, and more often than not, these people often spent a youth completely contrary to Christian values: engaging in homosexuality and libidinous sexual affairs. Again and again one notices the theme of apparent ‘sudden conversion’ at around the age of 30 to Christianity. In fact in the example of Augustine of Hippo it is believed that he abandoned Manichaeism because he could not rise to a position of power within its hierarchy.

The curious thing about all of the strict tenets of the Catholic Church is that they can be found in the Old Testament, but by no means, in the ministry of Jesus. It was precisely the divinely guided effort to re-imagine Jewish spirituality and rid it of empty ritual and meaningless stricture which was embodied by Jesus’ ministry on Earth, that the religion created in his name should so wholly fail in this regard and perpetuate on a massively increased global scale, the very same rigid systems of control and dogmatism which Jesus’ attempted to subvert, strikes of either some bizarre and tragic human satire or else a concerted diabolically orchestrated effort by the very same forces of control to exert themselves all the more. Perhaps indeed, this second is the case, and perhaps it is enough to be informed by a series of ideas originating in the original corrupt source, for those ideas to fertilize and bloom into the fullest tyranny of the original source. Perhaps these ideas are those which lie in the Kabbalah and it is this secret teaching which has always been present on Earth ready to manifest from occult theocracy into the machine of concrete human spiritual despotism.

So is it possible that the formation of the Roman Catholic Church was a Jewish sponsored creation, possibly even for the purpose of specifically expunging Christianity from the face of the Earth and replacing it with ‘their’ tyrannical version. Why else would the Catholic church for so many years actually prohibit personal ownership of a Bible and its translation into native languages under the pain of death? Pope Innocent III stated in 1199:

“... to be reproved are those who translate into French the Gospels, the letters of Paul, the psalter, etc. They are moved by a certain love of Scripture in order to explain them clandestinely and to preach them to one another. The mysteries of the faith are not to explained rashly to anyone. Usually in fact, they cannot be understood by everyone but only by those who are qualified to understand them with informed intelligence. The depth of the divine Scriptures is such that not only the illiterate and uninitiated have difficulty understanding them, but also the educated and the gifted.”

This became codified into church law in 1229 by the Church Council of Toulouse, and in 1234 AD the Church Council of Tarragona even ordered that anyone possessing books of the Old and New Testaments “must turn them over to the local bishop within eight days, so that they may be burned…”

The Council of Tolouse was called by Bishop Folquet de Marselha, a fierce opponent of the Cathars he was born into a noble Genoese trading family. Immediately this makes me think of the old Phoenician trading networks which were referenced in Cain’s Children and the resultant growth of the mediaeval banking network. This link between the church authoritarianism and the old Canaanite trading ports and networks may be coincidental or it may not, but in this mystery every lead and trail, no matter how tenuous or circumstantial needs to be considered and one may find that these threads do indeed lead to the discovery of a great tapestry of revelation and one may find that many of the mysteries which have plagued humanity for so long may thus be discovered at last.