Light, Aether and Dark Energy.

Science tells us that the speed of light is a fixed constant: 299 792 458 metres per second or 670 616 629 miles per hour. That's pretty fast. In fact it is the ultimate fast. It is what science considers the speed limit of the universe. Anything which goes beyond this speed would undergo strange transformations, so strange that they cannot physically happen, therefore nothing can exceed this speed limit due to the bizarre effects that it will have on matter.

It will gain infinite mass, which doesn't make sense of course, because inifinity does not and cannot actually exist in this universe. As the object gains velocity and accelerates closer to the speed of light, it will reach a point of greater and greater contraction of mass and its length. The theory of reaching infinite mass is based on the idea that a mass which is accelerating and closing in on the speed of light, will be repeatedly travelling faster than in the previous second and so as a result it will actually catch up with itself. The speed of light is the speed at which reality as we know it 'happens'.

The world around us buzzes into our eyes at the speed of light. If somehow we could stop the speed of light suddenly we would effectively freeze the universe. Nothing would move, everything would be eternally frozen, if the light in your retina which had then entered your mind would have stopped, giving you an eternal picture of a frozen universe.

But now imagine the speed of light slowly increased, to 5 miles per hour, then 1500, then 200,000 life would return to the frozen universe but only just, all of the electro-chemical light based energy in the human body which powers the muscles and the brain would run on much lower power, but it wouldn't matter so much, since the speed of light has changed, so have all the other forces in the universe so gravity itself and the strength needed to preambulate on earth would be so much less.

Imagine a rocket which could move at the speed of light. As it got faster and faster it would meet its own light image from a few seconds ago, and this light image would contain all the information and matter inherent in the rocket, all tied into the extremely high energy contained within a rocket travelling at such incredibly highly energetic speeds. In a sense the 'mass' of the rocket as we understand it, has become pure energy, what quantum physicists call 'potential'.

So as a result the infinitely divisable superimposition of potential energy states of the rocket will all be stacked up closer and closer to each other until the speed of light is ultimately reached at which velocity the rocket literally stops moving with respect to any other object in the universe, ironically at the speed of light it reaches an ultimate state of stillness. Movement after all is only a change in position relative to something else. Once one has somehow 'caught up' with the speed of the universe itself, then there is nothing to move in reference to you. Everything is moving at the same speed as you, therefore you are not moving at all. Like being on a moving train except that the train itself is the whole universe and there is nothing outside.

This would mean the rocket will have caught up with all the past energy potential images of itself and therefore its mass and reality will become infinite. And it's at that point of course that it ceases to exist, at least for those not on the rocket. An object reaching the speed of light will disappear completely in accord with Lorentz's principles since it's apparent length will have contracted so much because it is travelling so fast it is continually catching up with it's own reality and entering a state of time dilation, and since it is traveling faster and faster in less and less time, then in effect, it is slowly loses reality for the observer since less and less of it is actually captured in time in order to be fully observed. Until eventually it reaches the speed of light, the clock stops totally and poof! The rocket has gone.

But where has it gone? We have established that mass would be infinite if it existed in the universe and would cause all sorts of problems, including an infinite black-hole which would instantly destroy the whole universe, but it no longer exists in this universe so it's not a problem. Instead of mass the rocket now has infinite potential, and since the term 'potential' is a quantum measurement, then it exists within 4 dimensional quantum rules and can just as easily not exist as exist. The theory of quantum 'non-locality' as postulated in the De Broglie-Bohm theory leads to the view expounded by Bohm in his book Wholeness and the Implicate Order, of an: "unbroken wholeness of the entire universe".

This 'unbroken wholeness of the entire universe' would be an apt description for the 4d hypersphere which is the true energetic universe. This is where all the forces which manifest in 3d as apparently separate phenomena, are all unified in 4d but hold different relative positions which gives us the impression of their separation in our world.

The theory of quantum Non-Locality actually relegates our known universe of masses, forces and things moving around relative to each other, as 'local realism' and leads to the spiritually pleasing suggestion that there is another 'realism' in fact an ulitmate 'realism' as opposed to mere 'local' phenomena.

This ultimate realism I would define as 4d, where all the forces, the mass and the information about the particle or rocket, all enters a non localised, non measurable state of unknown potential. So that's it. We can't measure it anymore so it's gone! But if for a second it dropped its speed for below the speed of light for second (even though it isn't moving) then it would instantly reappear in our universe and immediately we could greedily take all the measurements we wanted, until it ups its speed and is gone again, which would leave someone like Newton with his classical mechanics, scratching his head.

The fastest thing in Newton's world was probably a falling apple and rockets and the speed of light, might have surprised him. But probably not too much as I suspect that were Newton to be suddenly appear on Earth and be briefly inculcated to the modern discoveries in quantum physics he would no doubt be facinated and after a couple of days study and calculation would no doubt be fully ready to enter the new-world of Quantum Mechanics and set to work. In 1704, Isaac Newton, aged 62, wrote the following lines in conclusion of his work Opticks, asking questions to the future:

"Do not Bodies act upon Light at a distance, and by their action bend its Rays, and is not this action strongest at the least distance?"

Not only did Newton appear to suspect that light itself could behave in relativistic ways but also I think the following extract from Opticks shows me that he too had a suspicion himself about the existence of the fourth dimension and I even believe he is elucidating the principlas of Quantum Physics, 200 years early:

"The Organs of Sense are not for enabling the Soul to perceive the Species of Things in its Sensorium, but only for conveying them thither; and God has no need of such Organs, he being every where present to the Things themselves. And since Space is divisible in infinitum, and Matter is not necessarily in all places, it may be also allow'd that God is able to create Particles of Matter of several Sizes and Figures, and in several Proportions to Space, and perhaps of different Densities and Forces, and thereby to vary the Laws of Nature, and make Worlds of several sorts in several Parts of the Universe. At least, I see nothing of Contradiction in all this."

To vary the laws of nature and matter of different densities and forces, seems to decribe pretty much what happens in the quantum realm. What we must understand of course, is that the quantum realm isn't merely a subatomic playground where odd sorts of things happen, and objects apparently appear and disappear at will, or seem to occupy several locations at once and cannot be accurately measured because they have no defined locality, but that this whole universe in the macro is built upon this foundation of quantum principles, therefore it too must follow quantum principles. And so it does. We find it manifested in what we call 'coincidences', where reality and events seem strangely woven together in a statistically improbable synchronicty. Also hypnotism, hallucinations, schizophrenia, paranormal activity, are all features of 4d reality, or the quantum realm, exposing itself to fleeting and unsteady observation in the local realism.

I think we're naturally wired that way to be able to use 4d firmware, except education, fake religion and the scientific establishment have been trying to block this access for the sake of building their own power and authority.

Basically science has a monopoly on the perception of what is real and this gives them huge power and resources. If science were to entertain spiritual and metaphysical ideas for a second then they would risk losing their monopoly to people who know more about these things than scientists. Obviously they're not going to risk that so they stand as one voice to oppose all such ideas.

Science rounds-off reality. Approximating what is real to a broadly accepted consensual standard which is just enough to be able to manipulate the physical and electrical world, but not precise enough to understand what is really behind all phenomena. For instance conventional science tells us a vacuum is empty, and had struggled for a long time to understand how light waves can propagate without a medium since the accepted idea is that a wave needs a medium to propagate in, indeed the wave and the medium are inseparable. For instance a wave in the sea. Where is the energy and where is the medium? They are one and the same.

And so scientists thought it must be with light but due to their being unable to find anything in the vacuum that might propagate the light wave and the theory of aether being discredited by the scientific establishment as too close to what they consider the perceived ‘quackery’ of something left over from days of mediaeval alchemy.

But it seems the aether theory is making a resurgence, except now the aether is actually composed of pairs of matter-antimatter particles which are continually appearing within the vacuum and disappearing just as soon as they arrive in a mutual elimination. This approach to theoretical particle physics has become known as Superfluid Vacuum theory, which is a Bose-Einstein condensate, a form of matter which exists at extreme conditions of temperature and pressure.

Marcel Urban from the University of Paris-Sud has developed a mechanism where the speed of light is dependent on the qualities of the vacuum and the energy levels and forces at play. His two concepts: permeability and permittivity of the vacuum play a role in defining the speed of light and this makes intuitive sense if we consider that the speed of light within a medium will change depending on the refractive index of that medium.

The speed of light within the medium is given by V = C/N where C is the speed of light in a vacuum and N is the refractive index of the medium. A vacuum is given the refractive index of 1. Being the basis upon which the speed of light C is defined. Water has a refractive index of 1.33, so dividing the speed of light by this number will give a smaller velocity than dividing by 1, obviously. Light travels more slowly in water than in air or a vacuum. The dense crystalline structure of diamond has a refractive index of 2.42 while lead comes in at 2.6. There are no units used in the refractive index, since it is a ratio.

There is a correlation between refractive index and the density of the material, but this rule is not absolute since the structure of the medium and the nature of the molecular lattices will affect the way the photons pass through the medium.

So this variability in the speed of light in a medium and new researches into the nature of the vacuum indicate that light, like any wave, DOES indeed need a medium to travel in, and the nature of the medium has an entangling effect on the light itself.

This fundamental notion leads us to ponder the question that if a 'true' vacuum were able to be created, would light no longer be able to move across the universe? And also if a vacuum isn't even a 'thing' or a recognisible, quantifiable and removable medium, then what is it? Is it the background canvas on which all the light and energy of the universe is painted onto? Could it be something connected to the hunt for 'dark energy' which presently eludes quantification by modern theoretical physicists.

For four hundred thousand years after the big bang there was a period of darkness when the universe was so hot (active) that everything that now exists within the universe was all stripped down to fundamental electrical charges, positive nuclei and negative electrons. This hot electromagentic lattice was so locked in charge symmetry that light was locked within the lattice. After this period the universe slowed, probably through entropic radiating interraction with the darkness. And the energy reduced allowing the charged lattice to break up and start to collasce into matter and atoms and light to move freely and expand its EM field through the cosmos. Though at this point there were no stars radiating photons and energy directly into the universe, the light existed as an EM Quantum Field, fillng the univere but without any observer existing in 3d at that point, so all the light was an invisible field of potential, and there was still a long period of darkness.

A so called Dark-Ages of the Universe which lasted for 100 million years. So for 100 thousand years the universe had no lower dimensions. There were no 1d, 2d or 3d objects, and there was no life existing within those dimensions. So of course they didn't exist. They hadn't been constructed yet. So the universe was in fact, from the period of its birth to 100 million years, two 4d realms locked in an energetic relationship. The 4d hypersphere and the 4d void. At this point the universe had not the matter to tie together into any lower dimensional realities.

To be continued....

Stay Happy!

This is us.

I've been really down recently and have started letting things get to me to the extent that I feel like giving up. Not that you can really give up. We've all got to get through this. But lately the unending death and carnage in the Middle East, the dead children, the tide of refugees trudging through Europe, the endless school shootings, the fear the uncertainty for the future.

It has all been seeping into me like a poison and darkening my soul to the extent that the light of positivity and human love inside me, has been going out in my mind, leaving just sad negative thoughts, self criticism, criticism of others, fears, all bounce around my mind like unwelcome parasites. It has been making me feel utterly helpless.

This is them.

Then a couple of hours ago I just got up and said to myself 'I've got to do something about this' I got down and I prayed and I meditated. I prayed first to be able clear my mind of the darkness and negativity that had settled in it and which I had fed with negative thoughts, and as my mind settled I realised I needed to meditate and find the clear space within myself.

So I sat down and tried to find in myself some instruction and some explanation for all the pain inside me, I totally calmed my mind and stopped all thought, but occasionally a negative thought or fear would flash up in my mind and I actually felt it as a surge of electricity. So I redoubled my focus on totally quietening all my thoughts and got the sense that I was no longer a consciousness operating from a physical brain, but that my consciousness had become a field which was focussed on wherever my will took it.

I found that if I focussed my will just above my head, I could reconnect with a dim light which just shone through. This I know of as God. God is the Light and all consciousness is part of an electro-magnetic field with the upper frequency reaches being the invisible energy source which powers the universe.

I asked a question in the light, it wasn't a question from my brain, it was from my true self, the consciousness field which can be accessed through Zen meditation; when all of the electrical activity has ceased and you achieve clarity. The question was about myself and what I consider my weaknesses and perceived failures. I then saw some key moments from my life and I realised why they had happened, they happened because events which had started before I was even born were in play that created a particular problem or weakness in myself. I saw my childhood and my parents and saw that my negative and confused behaviour in some instances was a direct result of some negative and inescapable parental influence and moulding. I saw that my life wasn't a series of mistakes, just a series of choices which I was always bound to make, since we are more or less, tied and constrained to a certain mental pattern and inherited behaviours.

I asked 'What can I do?'. And the answer was 'Just survive'.

Now, although 'Just survive' doesn't sound like much of an encouragement, it did encourage me and it made me realise that we are all constantly trying to do just that, but we forget it. We forget that at a primal level, we don't need possessions and job security, we are living beings in a semi-hostile environment and we just have to survive while behind these enemy lines. And that is what we must realise, forget about the fears, the horror and the misery, SURVIVE IT! Stay Happy.

This is a subtle war on the human spirit and while real wars are being fought in the Middle East psychological wars are being fought on all of us here at home.

They come from a million different directions too. It isn't just the media and politicians trying to darken our lights and make us weak and helpless and unable to defend ourselves against the many threats from society which is constantly trying to trip us up or exploit us. We no longer live in a peaceful civilised world, we live in an artificial jungle of created threats and predators introduced into our cages.

Don't know who this is.

Life has changed so fast and in such a surprising way. When I was young the world felt relatively sane and perhaps it was. Nowadays everything has reached such a frenzy of discord and negativity. From Feminism being rammed down everyone's throats like never before, to the music, entertainment and celebrities which have all reached some kind of ritualised peak of obscenity.

It is clear we are all under attack, and it's no use banging your head against all the pain fear and horror in the world, you will never win, it will devour your soul in the end. So we have to transcend it. We have to stay happy.

No matter what happens, the worse the avalanche of shit gets, the more confusion and lies which reign, the more you will have to make a conscious willful effort to be happy and hang onto it. You have to realise, its purpose is to BRING YOU DOWN. To crush your spirit! This is probably the real reason why there is all this horror in the world, the human agents call it politics and feel they have to play these war-games, but the demonic beings know the true purpose.

They have to degrade and exploit the people of planet Earth to the point that they can make people fall into despair. Once in despair you become like them, full of misery confusion, sadness and loneliness and your vision of inner happiness and the light of peace and understanding will go out leaving you a prey to the predators.

Zen meditation. Clear your mind, even in the darkest of times you can still find the inner light.

Inside your mind you can make a clearing for your true self, reconnect to the light, find it with your mind and you will be armed for whatever this dirty old world can throw at you.

Seeing in the right light.

The Double-Slit experiment, first performed in 1801 by Thomas Young is perhaps THE scientific experiment which represents the very beginning of the modern scientific era. A warm welcome and introduction to the present age of Light. It is the simplest and most incredible experiment carried out in science because it directly tries to analyse light and discovers a new universe with new-rules. This experiment really introduced the 4th dimension into classical 3d science, and it was not until 100 years later that Max Planck coined the term ‘quanta’ as a way to describe a quantity or discrete unit of light, and ever since science has been puzzling and scratching its head to try to figure out just what a quanta or light is anyway without much progress since this revelation at the dawn of the 20th century. 

The Double-Slit experiment is one of the simplest scientific experiments ever devised: it requires only two things: some light and an impermeable sheet with two slits in it. And that’s it. What the experiment lacks in complexity it has more than compensated for by the astonishing results which it has yielded. In fact, incredibly, the Double-Slit experiment itself, is in itself, a 4 dimensional experiment, that is mutable, it is an experiment which exists and is repeatable and stable in the scientific sense, but infinitely changeable and although devised with a certain hypothesis and outcome in mind, which it delivered, can also give different and contrasting results, depending on how the experiment is performed.

It is an experiment which has mutated and which can give DIFFERENT and contradictory results depending on the circumstances and details of the experiment. For instance, Thomas Young performed the experiment to analyse the nature of light which he suspected was a kind of wave. The supposed light ‘waves’ were duly produced by the ‘interference’ patterns produced when the light ‘waves’ went through the two slits, proving once and for all that light was indeed a ‘wave’.

However it was not until the invention of the cathode ray that single electrons could be fired through the double slits and would inexplicably lead to the same characteristic ‘wave’ diffraction patterns which Young had produced nearly a century before. So indeed it was the case with every particle they subsequently sent through the slits. Not only that but the dramatic conclusion reached was that a single particle somehow passes through both slits at once. As if it somehow transcends the limitations of time and space. A new universe had been discovered which seemed to obey a new set of rules. 

The ‘quanta’ of light, or ‘quantum’ physics is science’s way of saying we don’t know what it is because we can’t accurately measure it. It is not that light is a wave or a particle, it is because it has a 4 dimensional form which confuses us and leads us to fail to accurately quantify it. 

Quantum science is so called because it is looking for the ultimate 'quantum' of stuff, the quantity, the quality, its nature. What is it? What is a photon? They really don't know. Their 3d experiments resulting from 4d changes, endlessly confuse modern science as it seeks to quantify matter into 'colours' 'strings' 'fields' 'waves' and particles.

Our scientists are only seeing 3d results and only observing different aspects of the same ultimate reality, the unification of the field and the photon, simply, that the photon travels the whole distance of the universe instantaneously. It is every where at once and science merely observes its relative positions as 3d 'snapshots' of a multi-faceted 4d reality.

This is 4d. The photon behaves as a 4d particle by travelling through BOTH slits at once, and being in two different places in 3d at the same time, which being a 4d particle, it can do.

This also explains the mysterious nature of holograms as well. Again, we have light creating multiples, being in several places at the same time. When we divide the holographic film into smaller parts, every piece will show a reduced size 3d version of the full image, not a part of the image which is what happens if you cut 2 dimensional image, which seems counterintuitive to many, but this reveals the 4 dimensional nature of the photon.

In the holograms we have versions of the same image on infinite scales, because the photon is 4 dimensional and as a result, all it's sides are 3d. The 4d light photon interacts with the 2d film surface by creating multiple light patterns which when reactivated with more 4d photons produce 3d images. The photon imprints its 4d pattern on the film, namely that every side to a 4d shape is a 3d image and we see the 3d sides when we cut the 4d imprinted holographic film into pieces.

And so we get a multitude of 3d images. Like the 4d photon is OMNIPRESENT in 3d. It is everywhere at once (until we perceive it: quantum entanglement). Incidentally this also solves the mystery of God.

In quantum physics scientists have postulated string-theory and multiple dimensions apparently 'folded-into' minute sub-atomic strings. This theory actually makes sense on two levels. Both intuitively and pragmatically. First of all, on the intuitive level, if higher dimensions are accessed from only within the present geometry and not outside of it, then it makes sense that sub-atomic particles will open up new dimensions deep inside themselves. When these particles are destroyed then new 3d dimensional particles come into existence from within the inner 4d dimension which resolves into 3d particles, many of which exist for only short periods in 3d time-space.

Just as the higher dimension is within us, it is also locked within every electro-magnetic particle in the universe. Light itself for instance, travels in 4d (outside of time). Time does not exist from the perspective of the photon travelling at light speed. Time does not pass because there is no time. Everything is instantaneous for the photon. This is 4d reality.

We perceive the light travel at a certain speed and travelling a certain space within a certain time, because we are OUTSIDE of the eternity which the photon experiences. On the pragmatic level, to demonstrate how a higher dimension might be hidden in something small, think about a galaxy or a planet viewed from a certain distance.

From far far away a galaxy appears to be a flat round disk. So too would a planet viewed from afar. From far enough away it could be said to be a two dimensional object in space. However only when you move closer to the galaxy or planet in question do you start to notice it has 'depth' and isn't flat but has a thickness. The 2d circle viewed from afar on closer inspection is revealed to be a 3d sphere.

In a sense we are as 'far away' from sub-atomic strings as we are from a distant galaxy, so if we were to get closer to the physical centre of the universe (the string) its multi-dimensional 'depths' would reveal themselves. Hope this makes some sort of sense.

This also solves the problem of the apparent wave-particle duality of light revealed by the famous double-slit diffraction experiment. It is not that light is a wave or a particle, it is because it has a 4 dimensional form which confuses us and leads us to fail to accurately quantify light.

When the 4 dimensional shape is all of these things at once. Our scientists are only seeing 3d results and only observing different aspects of the same ultimate reality, the unification of the field and the photon, simply, that the photon travels the whole distance of the universe instantaneously. It is every where at once and science merely observes its relative positions as 3d 'snapshots' of a multi-faceted 4d reality.

The problem with science, among other things, is they only promote people who belong to their secret club. Scientists of the past have told the public. or demonstrated to them one thing, but have kept quiet about all the other things they're not allowed, or supposed to talk about.

The greatest inventors and scientists of our history have often been secret cabalists, alchemists, spiritualists, freemasons and more besides. The latest atheistic notions of modern science stem from the masonic 'mind control' which scientists either propagate because they are freemasons, or because they are told to from the freemasons who give them their grants and such like.

Also spirituality has also become a taboo subject on TV because many who work in the media have this fear of offending anyone. So noone talks about it.

All ultimately leading to the abnegation of God and higher possibilities, and leading to obedient tax-payers funding Satan's little helpers to run their world for them on behalf of their hidden masters, who few suspect even exists due to the materialistic nature of the science and media message.

Clever huh?

In a devious twisted way.

Perhaps the most astonishing thing about the double slit experiment is that it shows us a consciousness centred view of the universe. Refuting the materialist lie that matter makes consciousness, quantum physics is starting to show us that consciousness actually 'makes' or 'orders' matter. The particularly weird thing about the double-slit experiment and the collapse of the wave function is that it is NOT the measuring or recording device itself which collapses the wave-function but it is consciousness itself.

For instance, if an interferometer is introduced into the experiment to pinpoint the position of the 4d photon, then the interference pattern collapses and we see readings which would indicate that the photon was a particle after all. However if there was no 'access' to the information, and no readings were taken, then the wave-function would return and show the characteristic 4d wave-particle duality pattern. So if our minds can have an effect over one photon or electron then what more control can we have over the whole light based reality?

The Occult Cult of Celebrity and the Erosion of the Self.

The cult of celebrity is no different from the multifarious ancient cults of Gods, goddesses and mortals mixed up, often with fatal results, in the general spiritual hierarchy of the ancient world.

Some Gods live forever (Paul McCartney) some are tragically poisoned (Amy Winehouse) and others are ensnared by their love for a woman (Kurt Kobain).

These people exist within our TV screens and the pages of the media as stars of the great cultural mystery play which we’re all presently spectators of. The media mystery play seems to be a gradual inculcation of the OTO lifestyle of sexuality being the only thing of importance and, so it would seem, the only thing worth singing about. What has happened to music? Why are songs on the radio seemingly being produced to sell more sex, and more sexual experience, and being ‘freaky’ and trying new things? ‘I kissed a girl and I liked it’ really? Or are you just trying to mess with little girls' heads Katy? Do we really need more sex, most of us get it and tend to keep that stuff personal and private, drunken banter with mates excepted.

The reason most of the celebrities are up on stage being millionaires and hugely successful and worshiped by half of the world are twofold. Firstly they are there because they need to be there. These are people who want to be loved and idolised to fill their inner emptiness. I remember hearing Russell Brand saying that the reason he has a sex addiction is because he has something missing inside, he lacks inner contentment with his own being and so needs to approval and sexual love of others to fill this emptiness and also Geri Halliwell from the Spice Girls was heard on the radio talking about her new book and in an on-air conversation she said something along the lines of ‘it still doesn’t fill the emptiness’. And I think this emptiness is common with many of these stars.

Some musicians are great of course and make awesome music but even John Lennon himself was a member of the OTO and his death was likely a result of him becoming too much of a free agent and the OTO and Freemasons, exercise the power of life and death over their initiates and they can exercise this power using spiritual agencies which can possess human beings, rendering them dangerously mentally ill and capable of any evil against a person who is spiritually unprotected.

The problem is, these people are infecting the rest of the world with their egregious characters and setting themselves up as an object of envy for many people who  may start to feel de-localised from the self as they are more and more exposed to these media puppets and their dubious values: one wants to be like them and one envies them, so as is the case with children they start to absorb the moral values (or lack of them) associated with the content of the song and not to mention the video which is often chock full of Illuminati imagery and overt simulated sexual activity. Usually some under-dressed woman dry-humping something or someone while black dancing demons jump about in the background.

The second reason these people tend to be up there on TV is because they are  members of a secret society or other. Most sportspeople are freemasons and there is something hiding in the dark heart of the football world and it is child abuse and paedophilia and the recent suicide of former Chelsea striker Gary Speed  as a result of being abused as a child, leads one to wonder if there is perhaps a high price young boys have to pay in order to make it in professional sport. Some reports suggest something of a paedophile casting couch which the boys have to go through in order to make  progress in the game.

This extract from a Telegraph indicates that Gary Speed had a very special place in convicted paedophile Barry Bennell's (former football scout sentenced to 9 years for 23 counts of child abuse) esteem.

“There is no suggestion that he had been abused by Bennell. However, one of the six victims Bennell admitted to abusing suggested that the coach had referred to Speed, Davies and himself as “favourites”. He told the newspaper that Bennell used to refer to Speed as one of his “protégés”.

And in 2012 there was a special celebration of 150 years of the Football Association which show clearly the roots of professional football.

"It was on this very site 150 years ago that Ebenezer Cobb Morley and his friends met in what was then the Freemasons' Tavern, " said Bernstein. "They changed the world by producing the first laws of the game. Their original handwritten minute book is on display here today."

In America they had the Penn State child sex abuse scandal with former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky, using his charity organisation The Second Mile as a cover. In fact in recent times there has been an explosion  in convictions of child molesting football coaches:

Women’s football coach: Anthony Chattell

http://www.lep.co.uk/news/local/football-coach-faces-18-child-sex-charges-1-7166065

Football coach: Roy Morris

http://www.childabuselawyers.com/football-coach-roy-morris-jailed-sex-abuse-boys

Gateshead Football coach: Kane Hutchison

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/gateshead-football-coach-kane-hutchison-8936979

Chelsea’s children football coach Shane Hughes

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2985020/Chelsea-children-s-football-coach-accused-repeatedly-raping-12-year-old-girl.html

Welsh paedo football coach:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paedo-businessman-who-sold-school-4615319

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2526997/Paedophile-football-coach-arrested-burglar-discovers-shelves-child-sex-videos-tips-police.html

In fact football coaching and scouting appears to be, on sheer number of newspaper reports and sentences, the favoured domain of paedophiles using a position of authority and influence to abuse boys and girls.

Hollywood is no doubt the same, there are paedophile talent scouts and all kinds of opportunities for paedophiles to access children in the film industry, and I suspect they are successfully keeping a very tight lid on this in the news. Indeed I have no doubt that America has the same infection by Freemasonic paedophiles as does the UK, except for whatever reason, the press are more tightly controlled and perhaps certain people less uncompromising when it comes to the issue of leaks. This is perhaps why there have been so many recent unexplained or suspicious deaths in the American entertainment industry courtesy of the Star-Whackers.

http://www.truthspoonforum.com/t104-star-whackers-inc-probable-victim-list

Peaches Geldof is the most obvious recent victim of Star Whackers and it seems we have them in the UK too.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2312632/Introducing-Satanic-sex-cult-thats-snaring-stars-Peaches-Geldof.html

It is my belief that Peaches was murdered for spilling some of the beans and naming on Twitter the women who apparently let their children be abused by paedophile front-man Ian Watkins. Of course the media twisted it to turn the attention on Peaches and accused her of causing offence, but the women themselves were charged along with Watkins so why were they allowed to remain anonymous? Just to apparently protect their children’s anonymity but how does that help the rest of the UK help identify the dangerous perverts? It seems in this instance to be a convenient loop-hole for protecting the identity of someone guilty of being a menace to the public.

Why did the police close the investigation into find the drug dealer who apparently poisoned her with heroin?

"Detectives said they had "exhausted all lines of inquiry" trying to find out who supplied her with the Class A drug."

I find this very hard to believe, especially with someone with such an entourage of family and friends who would likely know something about who Peaches hung around with or who she got her drugs from.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-33376849

It seems to me that Ian Watkins and the women who helped Watkins abuse their children, were all part of the OTO, and were engaging no doubt in some evil Crowley sex-magick. Peaches knew something and blew the whistle against her own people, because she had to do what she thought was right, and she paid for this with her life. This is the reason they make you take death oaths, it’s pretty stupid to sign your life away to these people like this, and any time they consider you have breached their oaths of secrecy and mutual protection then they will kill you. Hardly seems worth it does it? But this is the price many of the highest paid most over-promoted celebrities in the world, if not all, celebrities must pay for the doors of fame, riches and success to open to them.

Here for instance is a list of rumoured OTO members:

http://www.ranker.com/list/famous-ordo-templis-orientis-members/user-x?var=2&utm_expid=16418821-135.-M4R2gbDRBSHMkmXmitadA.1&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.co.uk%2F

Jay-Z, John Lennon, Jimmy Page, David Bowie, Rihanna, Sting, Russell Brand, Daryl Hall, Paul McCartney, Kanye West, Madonna, Mick Jagger, Johnny Cash, Beyoncé Knowles, Ozzy Osbourne, Jim Morrison, Adam Lambert, Timothy Leary,  Marilyn Manson , Stanley Kubrick, Chris Martin, James Franco, Behemoth, Mudvayne, Carcass, Ronnie James Dio, John Frusciante, Bruce Dickinson, George Lucas, Phil Anselmo, Alan Moore, Aleister Crowley , Grant Morrison, Peaches Geldof, John Carradine, Graham Bond, Murder City Devils, Alejandro Jodorowsky, Andy Wachowski and  Lana Wachowski, Kenneth Anger, Stiv Bators,  Lon Milo Duquette.

I did wonder why Franco appears troubled these days in his movies and has lost the easy going goofy innocence of his older films, and I suppose someone like Brand who himself was sexually molested as a child and was taken by his father to visit prostitutes, indicates a not entirely healthy version of sexuality. And indeed so it is that sexual abuse tends to makes the child sexually aware at a young age and as result they have a different relationship to sexuality as the rest of us. Most homosexuals were abused as boys by men or even women. Freddie Mercury was famously sexually abused by his nanny, he even wrote a  verse about her in the song Fat Bottom Girls:

“Hey I was just a skinny lad
Never knew no good from bad
But I knew love before I left my nursery
Left alone with big fat Fanny
She was such a naughty nanny
Heap big woman, you made a bad boy out of me”

This talk of not knowing ‘good from bad’ is almost an evocation of the innocence of Adam before the fall. What does he mean by this? Did he eat the forbidden fruit of the snake Nakash (Hbr: The occult) and get involved in OTO Sex Magick at an early age along with people like Russell Brand, Amy Winehouse and Beyonce? Is it any wonder these people are so sexualised and indeed that their whole identity revolves around sexuality: all their songs, their whole performance, their very lives. Russell Brand is a perfect example of this, it’s very hard to take his attempt at politics seriously when he’s basically known as a guy with a serious sex addiction. Jeez, someone give Ol’ Russ a joint and get his mind off his dick. This also accounts for the overt sexualisation of young girls by these OTO popstars because sexuality defines their very being.

There seems to be nothing behind them except aggressive sado-masochistic sexual activity and the need to sing and dance about it. This is also similar of the gay rights movement in the West which is a very aggressive and all permeating campaign to oppress normality and make sexually damaged people feel perfectly normal, and woe to anyone who would say that being gay is ‘not’ normal. There’s a reason they represent than less than 10 percent of a population and it usually has to do with the presence of paedophiles who managed to access this 10 percent when they were still children. If there were no paedophiles then I suspect there would be very few homosexuals in the world. This isn’t a dig at gays. This is just a scientific fact which no one really wants to talk about, namely the connection between child abuse and a later abnormally developing sexuality. Whether this becomes homosexuality, lesbianism or just a heterosexual sex addiction which is what most of these stars seem to be presenting in their media.

http://illuminatiwatcher.com/aleister-crowleys-oto-entertatinment-industry-membership/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2312632/Introducing-Satanic-sex-cult-thats-snaring-stars-Peaches-Geldof.html

"Given her own dabbling in heroin and casual sex, particularly during a rootless period when she lived in Los Angeles a few years ago, it is perhaps natural that the troubled offspring of Bob Geldof and Paula Yates should be attracted to such a liberal school of thought. And if Peaches’ own interest is so shallow, heaven knows what her impressionable — and mostly very young — fans will take from it."

A former FBI agent, Ted Gundersen, who investigated Satanic circles in LA, found that Crowley’s teachings about 'raising demons to do one’s bidding' suggested human sacrifice, preferably of 'an intelligent young boy'.”

Instead of loving some cult celebrity figure people need to remember to love themselves. Loving yourself basically means being happy and satisfied with who you are. It is very difficult to do that when we are daily exposed to the life of luxury and excess which these celebs lead and which guy out there hasn’t at one point wanted to be a famous footballer or rock musician? Children are the biggest victims of these cults.They start to feel that their own reality is not good enough. Such was the effect of the film Avatar where children were reportedly crying after the film that they couldn’t stay in the Avatar 3d world. And this is their greatest weapon, this is why they have Celebs. They are here to steal your reality and that of your children and also give you the faint sense of unease that you aren’t as rich and successful as they are. Often these ‘stars’ are very rarely what they seem to be, and no clearer depiction of the sordid cult of celebrity was the evil goat-man Jimmy Savile. That such a man was apparently the first to introduce disco culture instead of watching live acts. Savile, according to himself managed to get young people to come to his nightclub and listen to a record player and public-address system instead of actually watching a real musical performance. Also it was Savile who was probably the biggest celebrity during a great part of the 60’s 70’s and 80’s.

An unprecedented period of reign for this OTO demon to run amok, with the full support of the British media, the Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and even Prince Charles. Savile called Prince Philip ‘The Boss’ and spoke almost with awe and fear when he spoke of him, much in contrast with the way he talks about his conversations with the Queen or Prince Charles. One wonders what role in this story is held by a man who Jimmy Savile himself described as :”The Boss” : the quasi German Prince Philip.

This personality cult is so destructive because it gave people like Savile unfettered access apparently to the UK children’s homes where he abused children. This acquiescence to the appearance of things and to the owner of ‘celebrity’ to indeed transcend the normal laws of the land and float God like and benevolent like a noxious mediatised vapour. The current crop of mediatised vapours to my eye include Man-Hunter Emma Watson and ‘kicking in tight pants’ woman Angelina Jolie Reborn in Rise of the UN Earth Goddess (It’s a bit like Tomb Raider but with more meetings about population reduction).

And so all our children see these artificial  images being presented to them and they pick and choose which cult they wish to follow. Many young girls followed the One Direction cult for a long time. Leading them nowhere. Others want to be wizards so they start looking into Ouija boards and Aleister Crowley. But all the while they’re also being exposed to a deliberately overtly sexualised and valueless music culture. Insane songs which value subservience and abuse “Hit me baby one more time.” But are all of an overtly sexual nature with allusions to fellatio and anal sex, all being contained within the paltry selection of metaphors the songs choose. For instance it should be common knowledge that ‘getting freaky’ and ‘I’m a freak’ are all black culture euphemisms for anal sex. Of course I don’t include Thom Yorke’s song ‘Freak’ as part of the anal-sex agenda. It’s a good song. Precisely the kind of powerful and lyrically meaningful songs which have lately all been replaced by music from the 24 hour OTO Sexatron.

You’d better watch what you choose to watch and just how much of their culture and values do you want to assimilate from sex-culty people like  Russell Brand or Jenifer Lopez. 

Recently I found myself in a little OTO nest in Camden Town, a well known pub called The Monarch. The following is verbatim the odd conversation I ended up having after a night of virtually stumbling into a black gang initiation involving a rubber glove which was left draped over a urinal and also offers of cocaine and a couple of strangely underage girls who seemed to be tagging around some of the people and a nasty strange sort of ‘cult’ atmosphere along with an unexpected confrontation with a strange 'Jewish' Zionist who seemed to be somehow mixed up in it all:

“When I went back to the bar I noticed that a few people including the bar-staff were sniffing and touching their noses and looking a big spacey. I went outside for a cigarette and remarked that most of the people here including seemed to be using these guys’ coke.

In front of me stood a short fat hairy man with a red face. He greeted me and asked me if I knew who I was. The strange thing was that as soon as he said this all of the thirty odd people outside suddenly scattered in all directions, like a kind of dissolved flash-mob. 

And I couldn’t get over the strong impression that him addressing me was a signal for everyone around who presumably were part of this thing with black gangs and coke or whatever it was. 

I asked him for a cigarette and he gave me a one willingly and asked me where I was from. I told him. He then told me that he was from Israel. 

I told him I lived in Morocco and he seemed surprised and said:

“Aren’t you scared?”  he seemed scared for me and I just smiled in disbelief.

“Why would I be scared?” and I immediately dismissed him as a lunatic of some kind. But he got excited and told me that he was from Morocco.

“Were you born there?”
“No, I was born in Israel but my parents are from Morocco.”

It seemed strange to see a man like him here, I didn’t quite understand what a man like this was doing here at all. His presence, like the presence of the black drug gangsters initiating each other in pub toilets, was somehow an imposition. 

Then he leapt into a strange sort of sales-pitch for the state of Israel, and I wondered if this could be connected to the spooky events of the evening. Was the free cocaine part of it too? If I had been coked up I wonder if I would be more receptive to this hairy red faced short little Israeli man. He told me all about the Hebrew patriarchs and I told him my man was Jesus.

He then went into an incredible spiel blending mathematics with religion, going on about the generations of man and asking me to make daft little calculations about how many generations ago Jesus lived. I think part of it was an attempt to bamboozle me with numbers and  getting me to give answers and also affirm his calculations, in a sort of rhetoric of acquiescence to  make me more receptive to his ultimate message whatever that turned out to be. Maybe this is what religious mind control looks like.

“So now, you like Jesus, so how many generations from now to Jesus? 1 generation is 25 years.”

“So 60 generations?”

“Yes, so 60 generations, so how many to Abraham, 120, 60 more than Jesus. Right?” I nodded.

“And  how many to Noah. Ten more generations, seventy generations before Jesus am I right?” I shrugged.

He continued: “And now, how many from Abraham to Adam. Remember they lived longer in those days because they were closer to God but we can call it 20 more generations! And Adam was the perfect man, and Noah was almost as perfect and was spared by God  and Abraham was next in perfection and chosen by God, and then a long time later comes Jesus.” His idea was as clear as it was ridiculous, that because Abraham was older than Jesus that he was better.  

Because he was closer to Adam who was according to this man ‘more perfect’ than Jesus despite the story of the fall from paradise. It was certainly a strange kind of theology.

“Do you know the story of Abraham and Sodom and Gomorrah!” I said I did.
“That Abraham made  a deal with God that God would not destroy the city if 50 good men could be found in it. Then he gradually convinced God to accept a smaller and smaller number of good men to be found because he knew there were so few. Until God accepted not to destroy Sodom if 10 good men were to be found there.” I wondered to myself if he was trying to tell me something about the nature of Zionist terror, that they first corrupt the culture in order to find as few righteous just people within it giving them the excuse they need to act for ‘God’ and destroy it. Rather like the League of Shadows from Batman Begins.

“We are animals” He said suddenly “We have to protect our family” I didn’t know quite where he was going with this but suddenly he had become quite bellicose and seemed to be rousing himself to some new religiously inspired madness.

“If I attacked you you would need protection wouldn’t you? He seemed to jeer at me.

“In ancient times I would fight you.” He said and I stopped him short:

“Hang on I there, I’d give you a pretty good run for your money. I can go nuts if I need to.” 
He backed off and stopped trying to physically intimidate me:

 “We need a big war to sort everything out in the middle east. We need to be safe from our enemies.”

“Your enemies?”

“The Muslims! We need answers.”

“I have the answers.” I said, because I did, I was drunk. Anything's possible when you're drunk.

I smiled at him in his angry bellicose fluster and in my drunken messianic righteous King guise I disarmed his diatribe and showed him I wouldn’t be joining his strange little club.

He looked at me and walked off.  He either didn’t understand or had to admit that he had totally failed to convince me that Israel should be allowed to instigate a huge world war to kill all its Muslim neighbours.  

Quantum physics and the Ultimate Reality.

‘The kingdom of God is within you’ Jesus.

Image courtesy of: Cristian Ilies Vasile and Martin Krzywinsk

The world is here to destroy your true nature and maintain your existence within a primitive materialistic frame of reference for as long as it can hold onto you. We are all physical captives to a system which runs our lives. It strips us of our sense of higher consciousness and the possibilities of 4d reality co-creation. The reason is, as we have learned from history, is that power bases can brook no opposition. The first thing any group holding power needs to do is to remove all opposition, and usually this is by massacres, interring people in camps, or just educating it out of the system.

The final example is one that is being used in the West these days and school ‘education’ is just a process of moulding the student to accept and subscribe to the ‘official reality’ which historians, scientists and the media all conspire to more or less create. In some cases some of things it says are largely true, particularly in science and maths, however science is taught as a substitute for and in opposition to spirituality and maths is taught as a explanation for the universe instead of what they really are: namely just a set of tools which mankind has invented to measure what he or she observes in the universe.  The following is exactly what they don’t really want you to know and it is what science has tried to obfuscate and deny for centuries in order to maintain their position of dominance on all questions relating to the material universe.

One of the first things to look at in questioning the scientific materialist paradigm is transcendental numbers  such as π. π is a number which measures the ratio between a circle’s circumference to its diameter. And that’s all it is. If anything π is a perfect symbol for how maths CANNOT actually accurately measure and fully quantify the universe. We can see in the fact that π is an endless number which can never be fully calculated out. It isn’t actually a number at all because a number is a symbol for a quantity, 1, 100, 18.75, but π is not a quantity, it is an incomplete calculation and the inability of maths to actual tell us what the ratio of a circle’s circumference really is.

We can only give the answer as an approximation to the real number.... so the circumference is 3.141592 something something something (forever) and a bit times larger than the diameter.  It is an endless series of numbers which is what our tools produce if we try to quantify the universe. We just can’t do it.  The difficulty in squaring the circle has been and still is one of the greatest puzzles of mathematics and shows how difficult it is for us to use our abstract tools to translate one two dimensional shape into another. Simply to construct a circle with the same area as that of a square. 

In fact in 1882 the task was declared impossible when π was discovered to be transcendental, therefore not an algebraic number and as such, not actually completely calculable. Other Transcendental numbers include all Real Numbers as opposed to integers or algebraic numbers (which are the sort used for counting, measuring and in equations).

π is actually a glimpse into infinity which is what secretly lurks behind the apparent material countable order of the universe. The universe at its heart is NOT countable, but is an engine which uses infinite and infinitesimal quantities to make its calculations. Something we cannot do, we can only approximate these quantities until at a certain point, accuracy is lost and our picture of reality totally breaks down. So maths can only measure the material world up to a certain level of detail.

When the universe and the ‘numbers’ or ‘ratios’ which dictate the shape of it go beyond a quantity or understanding which is measurable or repeatable; for instance no one in the world can ever possibly fully express π or actually use it to form a square with exactly the same volume of a circle. Or indeed a sphere can never be resolved into a cube. We can only produce an approximate ratio therefore for us there is a blind-spot, a loss of clarity or fuzziness around the edges of our vision of the universe. And so we are in the dark regarding the very smallest portion of reality, the tiny fractal logarithms which unfold and fill the tiniest edges of reality with form, and we cannot see them, we can see only a pixelated copy which loses detail the further you look into the image. And so here we have reached the limit of 3d. It seems that the ratios which in the creation of the forms of the natural world go beyond the limit of our ideas: duality, finitude and certainty.

The fourth dimension is where crude 3d based system of crude counting and manipulating quantities no longer work where nature is concerned. Nature doesn’t use a calculator or numbers. God is most assuredly NOT a mathematician. He uses something else. A kind of hypermaths, or 4d maths which uses something OTHER than numbers. Hypernumbers perhaps.  So therefore, maths and most certainly science, cannot accurately measure or even directly perceive, the absolute and real manner in which the universe is created and continually functions. They are elusive quantities. These logarithms which are the building blocks of the universe as we know it, trigonometry: the relationship behind 2 and 3d dimensional objects, and even the more familiar exponential functions such as squaring numbers or cubing them or raising them to any power.

What squaring and cubing really are, are mimics of growth cycles in nature, where for instance a bacteria culture doubles in size every 24 hours. However the bacteria don’t just magically all appear at the end of the 24 hour period, the growth is incremental, naturally, in the real world at least, mathematics has created this artificial perception that nature is just numbers and it isn’t. Numbers are added, subtracted or multiplied and a new number flies out. This isn’t how nature works at all and it is when trying to discover how nature REALLY grows and creates, that we run into transcendental numbers whose reality we can never truly access. Simply put, our numbers are insufficient tools to paint the reality of the engine of nature so the next time a smart-ass scientist or mathematician wanabee tries to tell you that everything can be reduced to maths or that mathematics is the meaning of the universe just put him or her in their place by asking them to give you an exact figure for π or for Euler’s number e. If he can’t (which is impossible using our methods) then you have demonstrated that mathematics cannot accurately measure the universe and therefore it is of limited utility when regarding these ultimate questions of life the universe and everything.   

Euler's transcendental number. The engine of change and growth in the the known universe.

These relationships are invisible to us except as a periodical set of numbers which appear, but as to why and how it is those numbers which appear in the sequence and a final ‘encapsulation of this logarithmic relationship’ we cannot find it, and so we will calculate and calculate long into deeper and darker depths of finitude without ever finding the light at the end of the tunnel: the ultimate answer.   

Big G.

No this isn’t the name of a new black rap-artist. This is a magic number that Newton had to stick into his gravity equations to make them work. Although it wasn’t directly measured until  71 years after Newton’s death by Henry Cavendish. The gravitational constant is approximately 6.674×10−11 N⋅m2/kg2 and is continually being revised questioned and recalculated. It even appears to vary at different locations, yet it is supposedly called the Universal Gravitational Constant. Some scientists have theorised that the fluctuations in the Universal Constant reflect the interference of possible higher dimensions distorting our reality. Indeed it is possible that even the existence of a base figure which needs to be implanted into our mathematical model of the universe perhaps hides some hidden force, distortion or ‘shape’ of the universe which we need to calculate around.

So our universe isn’t a linear 3d form with flat edges, straight lines and a smooth surface in which we all go about our business, which is how it appears to us, but it is knobbly and twisted to shape with strange recurring numbers and ratios woven into its very fabric. Numbers and ratios which we have a very difficult time determining.  The ratios and numbers are completely invisible and undetectable to all but the most determined physicist, but without them our whole universe would instantly fall apart. This mysterious gravitational constant is very very small indeed and is also related to the even smaller Planck constant is the ratio of a photon’s energy to its frequency and is around 6.626176 x 10^-34 joule-seconds

Strange Matter

Bose Einstein Condensate is like a super cold plasma  a billionth of a degree Kelvin above Absolute Zero. At Absolute Zero there is no longer any energetic motion within the atom, in a sense it is no longer physically active and at a position of total rest. At this temperature atoms and molecules are no longer separated as they are in other states of matter whether it be gas or liquid, instead they are woven together in a  fluid unity. Daniel Keppner of the MIT Department of Physics describes this new state of matter as something which thinks it’s everywhere at once.

Stranger still is the fact that a single photon is able to give 3 dimensional information. Recent scientific investigations using light-radar or Lider (the kind seen at the side of the road during geo surveying) have discovered that single photons can be recorded and used to build up 3 dimensional images of the surrounding land. So when a photon bounces off a surface it is imprinted with information about that surface. 

We do not know ‘how’ they are imprinted, or in what way is information ‘transferred’ to a photon. The only analogy I can think of and it’s a bit gross, is imagine you had a piece of gum which you spat onto the pavement. If you picked that gum up you would find it had recorded information about the pavement, namely it would be covered in dust and dirt from the pavement, its might also have changed as a result of being momentarily on a hot summer pavement or a cold winter pavement. If you stepped on the gum it would record the surface of the pavement’s shape. This is a little how photons seem to record information. They seem to suck reality and information from everything and anything they come into contact with. So what are they really? Little splats of gum? We literally don’t know.

Light is timeless light is spaceless, there is no separation between events as they are recorded by light. The speed of light is the speed limit of the universe and the universe ceases to exist in its present form at the speed of light. Therefore since photons travel at the speed of light they must exist in a state which is outside or apart from our present universe. The speed of light is the escape velocity of the universe. The  Lorentz contraction means that the closer an object were able to travel to the speed of light, the more it’s length would contract, namely it would get smaller and smaller. This effect is only noticeable from velocities of around 30 million mph, and then only at infinitesimal degrees, but the closer the object were to move to the speed of light 670 million miles per hour the more the object appears to get smaller and smaller until at the speed of light the length goes down to zero and the object disappears, at least to an observer. Anyone who could somehow record or perceive reality from the point of view of the object travelling at the speed of light would find that it wasn’t the object which became infinitely compact, but the universe itself.

The corollary of the object disappearing from the point of view of an observer would be that the object no longer existed in space and indeed that space itself no longer exists. We also know from Einstein’s theory of special relativity that time slows to zero at the speed of light, therefore we would no longer be in time and no longer ‘in space’. But let’s get this clear, this doesn’t mean the object no longer exists in some real way. Merely because it is no longer ‘in space’ doesn’t mean it has gone anywhere. Instead it is everywhere at once. Being ‘in space’ literally means to be contained within a boundary and to be located at some point within those boundaries. At the speed of light there is no longer any containment within space. The light IS the space. All of it. And a thing cannot be contained within itself. 

When  the Lorentz contraction effect on the speed of light reduces the object to a zero point in space it has effectively ‘tunnelled’ out of real space and is now free to be anywhere it likes and at any time.  This is perhaps a similar effect to that of quantum tunnelling which is a mathematically impossible process by which stars release photons from the fusion collisions at the heart of the sun. It is not actually hot enough in the centre of the sun, at a mere 15 million degrees Kelvin to power nuclear fusion, Earth based experiments to create nuclear fusion require temperatures 10 times this which are produced in a plasma Torus, however because of the quantum probability that a protons ‘field of action’ can interfere with another protons field of action, then despite there not being enough energy for this to take place, it takes place all the same. Physicists are far from certain of the mechanics behind this process but in all likelihood it probably involves the ability of a proton travelling at the speed of light to transcend time and space and to merge with the energy of another proton and therefore prompt nuclear fusion.     

Infinity does not exist in science but in maths is easily producible but it will probably cause you calculator some confusion. I haven’t used a pocket calculator for a while but in my day putting 10 divided by zero would make the calculator have a break-down and produce either the word ‘error’ or ‘c’ and this meant you had to turn it off an on again. It may seem weird for there to be an infinite number of ‘0’s’ in a number but it is easily demonstrable. Divide 10 by 10 and you get 1, divide 10 by five and you get 2, how about dividing 10 by a small number, say 0.01, well this is the same number as pennies in 10 pounds and the answer is 1000. If you make the number smaller and smaller then the answer will get bigger and bigger, this inverse ratio is limitless therefore in theory this calculation can continue towards an infinitely large number. So 10 divided by 0.000000001 would be 10000000000 so the assumption is that since the number gets bigger and bigger the closer one gets to zero, then at zero the number must be of infinite bigness. It’s slightly conceptual and perhaps may well be complete nonsense, but it is one of the assumptions mathematicians exploring infinity will work from, though your pocket calculator may not be quite in agreement.

Light itself is invisible until there is something which causes it to scatter into a direction where it can be detected by the eye. So the universe is in fact full of light and because light is both particle and a wave then it can exist and manifest as a point or region in 3d reality, for instance in your bedroom with the light on, but it also exists as part of the universal light wave which as we know transcends time and space. There is an infinite and eternal field of omnipresence which as we know, can record all of the 3d information in the 3d universe. It’s almost as if the material universe of matter and objects exist in shadow until brought into reality by the light. 

This light in reality is present inside the atoms of every molecule in the universe. Except that light energy which is still locked up inside the nuclear forces of the atom, exists contained in the 4^th dimension, this energy is released through a chemical or nuclear reaction and joins the 3d light field, the light however still exists within the 4^th dimension which transcends 3d time and space but now instead of remaining locked in the microcosm is free to explore and fill the 3d universe. There are photons filling every corner of the universe and some of them even end up in our eyes and it is these which light our world.  These photons and then absorbed and join the photons which make up the electromagnetic field of our own consciousness.

So when Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas  says: 

"I am the light which is on them all. 
I am the All, and the All has gone out from me 
and the All has come back to me. 
Cleave the wood: I am there; 
lift the stone and thou shalt find me there!" 

I think it is clear what the secret Gnostic message of Christianity and Jesus’ ministry is, and it is exactly what I have just distilled from the current explorations in Quantum Physics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAGPAb4obs8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK6HxdUQm5s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XR5XxDbpd2M#

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/25/single_photon_storage/

http://news.mit.edu/2013/3-d-images-with-one-photon-per-pixel-1128