THE KEY TO THE PRESENT IS BURIED IN THE PAST.

AND THE KEY TO THE PAST IS BURIED IN THE PRESENT.                           

                           

In order to understand the present we need to discover the secrets of the past. There has been an agenda unfolding throughout the years for the establishment of a Jewish homeland and Freemasonry has been its prime motor of action. We can understand how this has been achieved, by the activities of Jewish Kabbalists and Sabbateans infiltrating into Freemasonry during the 18th century, and people like Emmanuel Swedenborg were their disciples. Freemasonry has long been suspected of actually being a secret society with Judaic origins:

“Chevalier Ramsay delivered his famous Ramsay's oration, which described Freemasonry as an originally Jewish fraternity, whose secrets were discovered by the crusading knights of the Temple and then transmitted to operative masons in France and the British Isles.”

If we are to understand more about this manipulation, we need to understand everything we can about the arch manipulator Falk, but such men, whom one moment are under threat of being burned at the stake for witchcraft and the next are called by Count Cogliostro “the greatest man in Europe, the famous Falk in London” one would hardly expect to find clear footprints of all their movements.

In a report of the Vatican inquisition dated 1791:

'Cagliostro perceived that their [Freemasons’] ceremonies were disfigured and disgraced by magic and superstition; the principles of Swedenborg, a Swedish preacher; and those of M. Falc, a Jew rabbi, are regarded as chiefs by the illuminated.'

In her article: Jacobite and Visionary: the Masonic Journey of Emanuel Swedenborg, Marsha Schuchard writes:

“That Scottish Freemasonry had long traditions of 'second sight' was relevant, and some Swedish freemasons would later claim that Swedenborg possessed that peculiar gift of clairvoyance. See Tafel, 'New Documents', New Church Magazine, 4 (1885), p. 381, for Dr Husband Messiter's belief that Swedenborg possessed second sight.”

Hayyim Samuel Jacob Falk was one of the Ba’alei shem: a master of the divine name, a Ba’al shem is a Kabbalist who can write Kabbalistic amulets using the supposed name of God, and they were said to be able to conjure angels, predict the future, and offer protection from demons and disasters. Falk was said to engage in magical rituals in Epping forest and along the shores of the Thames. He became known as the ‘unknown superior’ of the Freemasons.

Hayyim Samuel Jacob Falk: One of the 'Unknown Superiors' of Freemasonry.

As member of the French Anti-Masonic league and founder of several anti-Masonic newspapers and writer of several books on Freemasonry, Andre Baron, pointed out the links between Freemasonry, Martinism, and Adam Weishaupt’s Bavarian Illuminati and wrote the famous maxim: "Remember that the constant rule of the secret societies is that the real authors never show themselves.”

Catherine the Great, the Empress of Russia was deeply critical and suspicious of Freemasonry and wrote a trilogy of plays satirising Freemasonry and specifically lampooning Count Cagliostro. In his paper entitled Catherine II and her Plays, Adam Drozdek relates the plot details of one of her anti-masonic plays The Deceiver:

“In The deceiver, Kalifalkzherston pretends to be able to double the size of diamonds, to speak with invisible Alexander the Great who during his lifetime visited him and gullible Samblin believed him. Kalifalkzherston promised Dodin to win for him Samblin’s daughter Sophia. He was also able to cure an imaginary illness of Samblina, which was pronounced to be a miracle. He promised Samblin to multiply Samblin’s riches by cooking money and small diamonds, but he fled with diamonds he got from Samblin for such a cooking; however, Dodin captured him, whereby he won over Sophia. The last words spoken by Dodin are addressed to the audience: ‘Such a deception is not new in the world, I think … it only takes up different forms in [different] times – this I give you for your consideration.’”

The character Kalifalkzherston is clearly intended to represent Cogliostro and the incident of stealing diamonds which were claimed to be used to cook to make bigger is echoed by real life event of the theft of a diamond necklace which had been loaned to him on the basis of a claim that he could use it to produce bigger diamonds. He was also involved in a much more sinister affair involving a diamond necklace which may have been the spark to start the French Revolution. The affair of the diamond necklace, which involved a jeweller on the verge of bankruptcy in need of selling an expensive diamond necklace he had made for Louis XV who had ordered it for one of his favourite courtesans, but had died before its completion and the courtesan subsequently out of favour in the new court, banished, leaving the jeweller out of pocket for the diamonds he had purchased for the creation of the necklace.

It seems then that several disgruntled parties united in a conspiracy against the new queen Marie Antoinette in an extra-ordinarily serpentine plot which seemed to unite several different strands of discontent and deftly weave them together to form a net to catch the Queen and promote resentment among the French sans culottes towards the French monarchy; events which would ultimately lead to the French Revolution.

Briefly the story is that the self-styled Comtesse de la Motte, Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy, having aristocratic ancestry but whose father was a dissolute drunkard, wanted to augment the stipend she received from the royal court to allow her to live in a manner which she felt befitted her. She found a dupe in the form of Cardinal Rohan who was out of favour with Marie-Antoinette but was desperate to ingratiate herself with the queen. La Motte apparently pretended that she was a close confidante of the Queen and gave Rohan letters forged by her lover Retaux de Villette, expressing not only her appreciation of his qualities, but later, her love for him. La Motte even arranged a meeting between Rohan and a prostitute who resembled Marie Antoinette. In exchange La Motte borrowed large sums of money from Rohan which she told him was for the Queen’s charitable activities but which was in reality to fund her own lifestyle.

La Motte was then approached by the jewellers to be an accessory to help them sell the diamond necklace in exchange for a commission. Retaux forged letters from the Queen to Cardinal Rohan with an order to buy the necklace, saying that she wanted to buy the necklace secretly in order to avoid any negative publicity over spending such a large sum (equivalent of 10 million pounds in today’s money) at a time when so many French citizens were living in poverty and struggling for subsistence.

Jeanne accused Count Cagliostro of being the one who persuaded the Cardinal to purchase the necklace and thus was potentially, the manufacturer of the necklace plot. It is curious that while Cardinal Rohan was immediately arrested, and who was ultimately only a poor dupe, one of the main agents of the whole affair, the so-called Comtesse de la Motte was not arrested until three days later, giving her ample time to destroy all correspondence and evidence implicating those also involved, such as the Freemason Count Cagliostro.

Despite Marie Antoinette being entirely blameless and indeed, the very acme of a victim of a tawdry and base conspiracy, public opinion went against her, no doubt the manner in which the affair was handled by the press may have had an effect. Cardinal Rohan’s acquittal also seemed to infer his innocence and the guilt of the Queen who, it was believed, had used the Comtesse de la Motte in her own conspiracy against Cardinal Rohan.

Jeanne de la Motte although found guilty and imprisoned, later escaped and fled to England where she published her memoirs where she attacked the wronged Queen and portrayed herself as an innocent victim of her courtly intrigues. The hand of providential justice in her case however, was not long in catching up with her, and whether it was through the agent of avenging angels and a God who had decided to withdraw divine protection, or agents of Cagliostro eager to cauterise any loose ends, she ended up falling from her hotel room window while apparently hiding from debt collectors, although her husband claimed it was agents of the revolutionaire Duc d’Orleans, grand master of the Grand Orient de France Freemasonic lodge, who may have been one of the agents trying to cauterise said loose end.

As reported in The Times she was found ‘terribly mangled, her left eye cut out, one of her arms and both her legs are broken,” and the woman she maligned and played her part in her ultimate downfall, Marie Antoinette, died two years after her on the guillotine in 1793.

The Duke of Orleans himself, as cousin to King Louis XVI, was a member of the royal elite who had become a revolutionary and had even voted in favour of a death sentence for the King. Like so many of the revolutionaries like the bloodthirsty Robespierre, he found himself hoist with his own petard, suffering the same ignominious death at the sharp quick kiss of madam Guillotine. What we see here is the casting off of the puppet, or useful idiots and dupes: those Freemasons which have outlived their usefulness and who ‘know too much’ while those operating and manipulating from behind the scenes, alone survive the horror they have unleashed.

From Webster’s Secret Societies and Subversive Movements:

“But all these secret sources of instruction are wrapped in mystery. Whilst Saint-Germain and Cagliostro--who is referred to in this correspondence in terms of light derision--emerge into the limelight, the real initiates remain concealed in the background. Falk ‘is almost inaccessible!’ Yet one more almost forgotten document of the period may throw some light on the important part he played behind the scenes in Masonry.”

And quoting the Jewish Encyclopædia:

“Falk ... is ... believed to have given the Duc d'Orléans, to ensure his succession to the throne, a talisman consisting of a ring, which Philippe Egalité before mounting the scaffold is said to have sent to a Jewess, Juliet Goudchaux, who passed it on to his son, subsequently Louis Philippe.

Nesta Webster makes the connection between Falk and the Duke of Orleans explicit:

“One fact, then, looms out of the darkness that envelops the secret power behind the Orléanist conspiracy, one fact of supreme importance, and based moreover on purely Jewish evidence: the Duke was in touch with Falk when in London and Falk supported his scheme of usurpation. Thus behind the arch-conspirator of the revolution stood ‘the Chief of all the Jews.’ Is it here perhaps, in Falk's ‘chests of gold,’ that we might find the source of some of those loans raised in London by the Due d'Orléans to finance the riots of the Revolution, so absurdly described as ‘l'or de Pitt’?

The direct connexion between the attack on the French monarchy and Jewish circles in London is further shown by the curious sequel to the Gordon Riots. In 1780 the half-witted Lord George Gordon (as a Jewish writer describes him), the head of the so-called ‘Protestant’ mob, marched on the House of Commons to protest against the bill for the relief of Roman Catholic disabilities and then proceeded to carry out his plan of burning down London. During the five days' rioting that ensued, property to the amount of £180,000 was destroyed. After this ‘the scion of the ducal house of Gordon proved the durability of his love for Protestantism by professing the Hebrew faith,’ and was received with the highest honours into the Synagogue.

The same Jewish writer, who has described him earlier as half-witted, quotes this panegyric on his orthodoxy: ‘He was very regular in his Jewish observances; every morning he was seen with the philacteries between his eyes, and opposite his heart.... His Saturday's bread was baked according to the manner of the Jews, his wine was Jewish, his meat was Jewish, and he was the best Jew in the congregation of Israel.’ And it was immediately after his conversion to Judaism that he published in The Public Advertiser the libel against Marie Antoinette which brought about his imprisonment in Newgate.”

So behind all of the movements and personalities instrumental to fomenting the French Revolution we find this man Falk. He is unlikely to have been the sole ‘manipulator’ of all the Masonic puppets but he is one whose name has been revealed to us through history and one we should not forget because if we do not learn from the mistakes of the past, we will be doomed to repeat them, and that seems to be the course for humanity because we do not have enough people who know any of this information or indeed, have the remotest interest in it. Yet if it were to appear clearly to their eyes that knowing this information and acting on it would protect them, their children, friends and loved ones, from the outrages of war and revolution that these people are continually manoeuvring us into, then they would act, at least one would hope so. But I sadly just cannot see any of this happening so this information will have to remain with those who have the sense to protect and preserve themselves and their loved ones, and will be able to see the same tell-tale signs, which have been endlessly repeated through history, which most people will be oblivious to until they are consumed. The wise will have made contingencies to remove themselves from the scene of devastation, watchful with eyes wide open and fleet of foot, and not, dozing in front of the television while the news reporter rings the toll of their doom.

So to return to Falk, who was one of the mysterious hidden rulers of Freemasonry, a Sabbatean Kabbalist and beloved of Jewish financiers, and linked to some of the worst excesses of bloodshed of the 18th Century in the form of the French Revolution, I am astonished to find that he was my neighbour for nearly a year since his rotten mouldering bones lay probably not much further than 100 metres from where I slept at Stocks Court for my first year down the Globe Road, for the man is actually buried around the corner from my old Halls of Residence at Stepney Green of my old University Queen Mary College in Mile End.
 

He is still remembered and commemorated as his grave stone has a raised platform with a metal box beneath it containing many small tea-lights which no doubt, are lit to commemorate him.

The epitaph on his tomb reads:

"Here is interred ... the aged and honourable man, a great personage who came from the East, an accomplished sage, an adept in Cabbalah.... His name was known to the ends of the earth and distant isles.”

The university was built around and incorporated several old parcels of Jewish cemetery, one such, somewhat incongruously sandwiched between the faculty of English building I attended for three years, and the medical sciences building and I am surprised that knowledge of a man whose activities would solve so many of the riddles of the past and present, had been lying right under my nose for the several years of my time at Queen Mary College.

His body lies in the Old Velho Jewish cemetery of Mile End behind a building called Albert Stern house, named after a Jewish banker (imagine that!) in charge of British tank production during World War One, which when compared to the relatively recent towering halls of residence around it, seems almost hidden by its comparatively small size and old grey stone construction against the garish materials of the newer buildings. This building is also a halls-of- residence for students and even has a couple of plaques in Hebrew and English on the front commemorating the cemetery, the Jewish hospital which used to be on the site and the cemetery behind it and also a plaque commemorating Edward Lumbrozo Mocatta, from the Jewish family of financiers originally from Portugal, who died in 1915. Dennis Wheatley in his 1930’s novel The Devil Rides out features an odious and greasy character called Mocatta who is the foreign leader of a Satanic cult who has the ability to conjure demons.
            

 
I once used to spend time in that building smoking weed and listening to Pink Floyd with a ginger haired former public school-girl called Natasha and known as Flash to her friends, who was on my Astrophysics course, which I abandoned in favour of English literature. It’s at times like this that I think of backwards causality, where events in the past can be influenced by events in the future, or at least that they can be connected in some way which indicates an ordering outside of time. Indeed, Jacques Vallee comes upon a similar theory which he terms: ‘the Associative Universe’ where he postulates the theory that the universe is not ordered in space and time but by associations; that is there is a mechanism of order which tries to group associative events, this is what we call ‘coincidence’ and it reveals an innate associative order of the universe which exists beyond our perception of linear time:

“I believe there is a system around us that transcends time as it transcends space. I remain confident that human knowledge is capable of understanding this larger reality. I suspect that some humans have already understood it, and are showing their hand in several aspects of the UFO encounters. If there is no time dimension as we usually assume there is, we may be traversing events by association. Perhaps I had unconsciously posted such a request on some psychic bulletin board with the keyword ‘Melchizedek.’ If we live in the associative universe of the software scientist rather than the sequential universe of the spacetime physicist, then miracles are no longer irrational events. Instead, consciousness should be defined as the process by which informational associations are retrieved and traversed. The illusion of time and space would be merely a side effect of consciousness as it traverses associations.”

I discovered this same phenomenon independently and I term it as ‘creating a coherent unit of reality’ and wrote about it in my book “Light in the Darkness: 4D Investigations”:

“A pattern in 4d reality is the ordering of events and phenomena into recognizable and meaningful patterns of reality. This is what a coincidence is. It is the arrangement of people and events into a meaningful coherent unit of reality.

The perception of time and the sequencing of events in time, gives us the impression that there are different moments in reality. That last year IS a different moment in reality, that ten minutes ago was something else which has now passed and that tomorrow likewise will be a different ‘moment’ in reality. However, these aren’t really different moments but part of the same ongoing continuum which we perceive sequentially and separated by time, but this separation is only a human perception. There is no reason why yesterday cannot be connected to tomorrow, not just forward in time, but also backwards in time because fundamentally there IS no time, there is only one eternal moment. That ongoing perception SIGNAL which we are all connected to.”